首页> 外文期刊>Current Microbiology: An International Journal >Rapid hybridization probe assay and PCR for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urinary tract infections: a prospective study
【24h】

Rapid hybridization probe assay and PCR for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urinary tract infections: a prospective study

机译:快速杂交探针检测和PCR检测尿路感染中的沙眼衣原体:前瞻性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Chlamydia trachomatis is a widespread bacterium that causes trachoma and genital tract infections in humans. The fact that the growth of this pathogen does not normally occur outside living cells poses a challenge in its diagnosis. The present study aimed to compare the efficacies of different molecular and cultural methods in the detection of C. trachomatis in urine samples collected from patients with urinary tract infections. Examined detection methods involved the Gen-Probe C. trachomatis (GP-CT) assay, direct antigen detection by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method. The efficacies of these methods were compared to that of the cell culture technique depending on sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. C. trachomatis was detected in 25 out of 50 (50%) of examined urine samples using the cell culture method. Compared with this standard technique, the GP-CT assay was the most sensitive procedure, being able to detect the pathogen in all positive samples, followed by PCR and ELISA, which showed 60% and 40% sensitivities, respectively. PCR and ELISA displayed the highest level of specificity (100%) compared to the cell culture method with the GP-CT assay showing 40% specificity. The rate of accuracy was comparable between the GP-CT, PCR, and ELISA methods ranging from 70-80% of the accuracy of the cell culture method. The above results suggest that C. trachomatis is a frequent pathogen associated with upper and lower urinary tract infections. Both the GP-CT assay and PCR method can be recommended as reliable detection methods for C. trachomatis, and the GP-CT can be used as a screening tool.
机译:沙眼衣原体是一种广泛的细菌,可在人体内引起沙眼和生殖道感染。这种病原体的生长通常不会在活细胞外发生,这一事实给诊断带来了挑战。本研究旨在比较从尿路感染患者尿液样本中检测沙眼衣原体的不同分子和文化方法的功效。检验的检测方法包括沙眼衣原体Gen-Probe沙眼衣原体(GP-CT)检测,酶联免疫吸附法(ELISA)直接抗原检测和聚合酶链反应(PCR)方法。根据灵敏度,特异性和准确性,将这些方法的效率与细胞培养技术的效率进行了比较。使用细胞培养方法在检查的50个尿液样本中有25个(50%)检测到沙眼衣原体。与该标准技术相比,GP-CT分析是最灵敏的方法,能够检测所有阳性样品中的病原体,其次是PCR和ELISA,分别显示60%和40%的敏感性。与细胞培养方法相比,PCR和ELISA显示出最高的特异性(100%),而GP-CT分析显示出40%的特异性。 GP-CT,PCR和ELISA方法的准确率相当,范围为细胞培养方法的70-80%。以上结果表明,沙眼衣原体是与上,下尿路感染相关的常见病原体。 GP-CT测定法和PCR方法都可以推荐为沙眼衣原体的可靠检测方法,GP-CT可以用作筛选工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号