...
首页> 外文期刊>Obstetrics and Gynecology: Journal of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists >Singleton, Term, Vertex Cesarean Delivery on a Midwife Service Compared With an Obstetrician Service
【24h】

Singleton, Term, Vertex Cesarean Delivery on a Midwife Service Compared With an Obstetrician Service

机译:单身级,一词,顶点剖腹产在助产士服务与产科医生服务相比

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the difference in odds of cesarean delivery in term, singleton, vertex pregnancies between the midwife and obstetrician-led services at the same rural tertiary care center. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of term, singleton, and vertex deliveries in patients without a history of cesarean delivery was performed. Patients self-selected a delivery service. The primary outcome was the odds of cesarean delivery between midwife and obstetrician-led services. After propensity score matching, logistic regression was performed on the matched sample to assess the adjusted odds of cesarean delivery. RESULTS: From January 2015 to December 2017, 1,787 (80.2% of total) deliveries were analyzed with management of 956 (53.5%) by the midwife service and 831 (46.5%) by the obstetrician-led service. The rate of cesarean delivery was 20.7% (n=172) in the obstetrician-led service and 13.1% (n=125) in the midwife service. In the matched sample, the odds of cesarean delivery were lower in the midwife service compared with the obstetrician-led service in unadjusted and adjusted analyses (odds ratio [OR] 0.62, 95% CI 0.47-0.81; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.58, 95% CI 0.44-0.80). Older maternal age (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.06; aOR 1.07, 95% CI 1.04-1.10) and higher delivery body mass index (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04-1.08; aOR 1.07, 95% CI 1.04-1.09) were associated with higher odds of cesarean delivery. Increased parity was associated with decreased odds of cesarean delivery (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.31-0.55; aOR 0.35, 95% CI 0.26-0.48). There were no differences in neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSION: At a single rural tertiary care center, patients on the midwife service have significantly lower adjusted odds of cesarean delivery than patients on the obstetrician-led service.
机译:目的:评价赛季赛马递送的几率差异,单身,跨国公司和产科医生在同一农村高等教育中心的服务。方法:进行术语,单身和患者患者的术语,术语的回顾性队列研究,没有剖腹产递送的历史。患者自选择送货服务。主要结果是助产士和产科医生服务之间的剖宫产的几率。在倾向得分匹配后,对匹配的样品进行逻辑回归,以评估剖腹产的调整次数。结果:2017年1月至2017年12月,通过助产士服务管理,通过管理956(53.5%)的管理和经济型领导服务831(46.5%)分析1,787名(总计8.2%)。在产科医生 - LED服务中,剖宫产率为20.7%(n = 172),助产士服务中的13.1%(n = 125)。在匹配的样本中,媒体服务的几率与未经调整和调整分析的产科 - LED服务相比,媒体服务较低,与产科 - LED服务(赔率比[或] 0.62,95%CI 0.47-0.81;调整后的赔率比[AOR] 0.58 ,95%CI 0.44-0.80)。年龄较大的母龄(或1.02,95%CI 1.00-1.06; AOR 1.07,95%CI 1.04-1.10)和更高的输送体重指数(或1.06,95%CI 1.04-1.08; AOR 1.07,95%CI 1.04-1.09 )与循环递送的几率较高有关。增加的奇偶校验与碳缩放递送的几率降低(或0.41,95%CI 0.31-0.55; AOR 0.35,95%CI 0.26-0.48)。新生儿结果没有差异。结论:在一家农村三级护理中心,助产士服务患者在产科医生服务的患者方面显着降低了剖宫产率的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号