...
首页> 外文期刊>Radiology >Pure and part-solid pulmonary ground-glass nodules: Measurement variability of volume and mass in nodules with a solid portion less than or equal to 5 mm
【24h】

Pure and part-solid pulmonary ground-glass nodules: Measurement variability of volume and mass in nodules with a solid portion less than or equal to 5 mm

机译:纯净和部分固体肺部玻璃结节:测量的结节中的体积和质量的可变性,固体部分小于或等于5mm

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To prospectively assess and compare the measurement variability of volume and mass for pure and part-solid ground-glass nodules (GGNs) with solid portions less than or equal to 5 mm by using a commercially available volumetric software program. Materials and Methods: This prospective study was approved by the institutional review board. Written informed consent was obtained. From November 2011 to June 2012, 73 patients (26 men and 47 women) with 94 GGNs (>5 mm and <20 mm; 72 pure and 22 part-solid GGNs) were prospectively enrolled and underwent two consecutive computed tomographic (CT) examinations. Both the volume and mass of GGNs were measured with volumetric software by two radiologists. Intraobserver, interobserver, and interscan variability were analyzed and compared by using the Bland-Altman method and coefficients of variation. The influence of the solid portion of GGNs and GGN size on interscan variability was investigated with multiple linear regression analysis and analysis of variance. Results: Nodule segmentation was successful in 420 of 438 (95.9%) segmentations. As for volume measurement, interscan variability ranged from 217.3% to 18.5%, while intraobserver and interobserver variability ranged from 27.6% to 8.5% and from 211.7% to 18.1%, respectively. Interscan variability in mass measurement ranged from 217.7% to 18.6%, while intraobserver and interobserver variability ranged from 28.4% to 9.4% and from 217.5% to 11.8%, respectively. In the coefficient of variation comparison, there were no significant differences in volume and mass measurements for intraobserver, interscan, and interobserver variability. Measurement variability of volume and mass was not significantly influenced by the presence of a solid portion, solid portion size, or GGN size. Conclusion: Mass measurement of GGNs showed measurement variability from 217.7% to 18.6% and may be a useful method in the follow-up of GGNs with solid portions less than or equal to 5 mm. q RSNA, 2013.
机译:目的:通过使用商业上可获得的体积软件程序,预期评估和比较纯和部分固体覆盖 - 玻璃结节(GGNS)的体积和质量的测量变化和质量和质量的测量变异性。材料和方法:该预期研究由机构审查委员会批准。获得了书面知情同意书。 2011年11月至2012年6月,73名患者(26名男子和47名女性),94个GGNS(> 5毫米和<20毫米; 72纯和22份固体GGN),并进行了两次连续的计算断层(CT)检查。通过两个放射科医师的体积软件测量GGN的体积和质量。通过使用Bland-Altman方法和变异系数来分析和比较intraobserver,Interobserver和Interscan变异性。研究了GGNS和GGN大小对间隙变异性的影响,具有多元线性回归分析和方差分析。结果:结节分割成功于438名(95.9%)分割。对于体积测量,间隙变异范围为217.3%至18.5%,而跨内钻头和interobserver可变性分别为27.6%至8.5%,分别为211.7%至18.1%。大规模测量的间隙变异范围为217.7%至18.6%,而跨内钻头和interobserver变异性分别为28.4%至9.4%,分别为217.5%至11.8%。在变异系数比较中,跨内器,间隙和Interobserver变异性没有显着差异和质量测量。体积和质量的测量变化不会受到固体部分,固体部分或GGN尺寸的存在的显着影响。结论:GGNS的质量测量显示测量可变性217.7%至18.6%,并且可以是GGN随访的有用方法,具有小于或等于5mm的固体部分。 q rsna,2013。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Radiology》 |2013年第2期|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Radiology Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Seoul National;

    Department of Radiology Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Seoul National;

    Department of Radiology Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Seoul National;

    Department of Radiology Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Seoul National;

    Department of Radiology Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Seoul National;

    Department of Internal Medicine Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Seoul National;

    Department of Radiology Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Seoul National;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 放射医学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号