【24h】

Is pQCD energy loss in trouble?

机译:PQCD能量损失陷入困境吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Current pQCD calculations for the energy loss of a hard parton moving through a medium of thermalized static scattering centres are inapplicable to the small colliding systems (such as p + A) that have, in recent years, hinted at the presence of tiny droplets of QGP through the presence of collective behaviour, strangeness enhancement and quarkonium suppression. The well-known DGLV, ASW, BDMPS-Z, AMY and HT calculations all exploit both the large separation distance (between scattering centre and radiation) and the large system approximations. We relax the large system assumption and recompute the energy loss in the DGLV formalism in order to address the glaring lack of theoretical control over small-system energy loss. Alarmingly, we find that the correction terms dominate at large energies, resulting in similar to 100% negative correction, calling into question the validity of the large formation time assumption used in all pQCD-based energy loss calculations. Our results demand a complete overhaul of energy-loss calculations for all system sizes.
机译:当前PQCD计算通过热化静态散射中心介质移动的硬PAREON的能量损失是不适用于近年来在QGP的微小液滴存在下的小型碰撞系统(如P + A)的小型碰撞系统(如P + A)通过集体行为的存在,陌生症增强和夸曲抑制。众所周知的DGLV,ASW,BDMPS-Z,AMY和HT计算所有都利用了大的分离距离(散射中心和辐射之间)和大系统近似。我们放宽大型系统假设,并重新计算DGLV形式主义中的能量损失,以解决对小型系统能量损失的显着缺乏理论控制。令人惊讶的是,我们发现惩戒术语在很大的能量中占主导地位,导致100%的负校正,呼吁质疑所有PQCD的能量损失计算中使用的大形成时间假设的有效性。我们的结果要求全面对所有系统尺寸进行能量损耗计算的全面大修。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号