...
首页> 外文期刊>Neuroscience Letters: An International Multidisciplinary Journal Devoted to the Rapid Publication of Basic Research in the Brain Sciences >Distinct behavioral response of primary motor cortex stimulation in itch and pain after burn injury
【24h】

Distinct behavioral response of primary motor cortex stimulation in itch and pain after burn injury

机译:烧伤后瘙痒和疼痛在瘙痒和疼痛中的明显行为响应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It is still unclear whether chronic neuropathic pain and itch share similar neural mechanisms. They are two of the most commonly reported challenges following a burn injury and can be some of the most difficult to treat. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has previously been studied as a method to modulate pain related neural circuits. Therefore, we aimed to test the effects of tDCS on post-burn neuropathic pain and itch as to understand whether this would induce a simultaneous modulation of these two sensory manifestations. We conducted a pilot randomized controlled clinical trial comprised of two phases of active or sham M1 tDCS (Phase I: 10 sessions followed by a follow-up period of 8 weeks; Phase II: additional 5 sessions followed by a follow-up period of 8 weeks, and a final visit 12 months from baseline). Pain levels were assessed with the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and levels of itch severity were assessed with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Measurements were collected at baseline, after the stimulation periods, at 2, 4 and 8-week follow up both for Phase I and II, and at the final visit. Sixteen patients were assigned to the active group and 15 to the sham group. Ten sessions of active tDCS did not reduce the level of pain or itch. We identified that itch levels were reduced at 2-week follow-up after the sham tDCS session, while no placebo effect was found for the active group. No difference between active and sham groups was observed for pain. We did not find any treatment effects during Phase II. Based on these findings, it seems that an important placebo effect occurred during sham tDCS for itch, while active Ml tDCS seems to disrupt sensory compensatory mechanisms. We hypothesize that pain and itch are complementary but distinct mechanisms of adaptation after peripheral sensory injury following a burn injury and need to be treated differently.
机译:目前还不清楚慢性神经性疼痛和瘙痒率是否共享相似的神经机制。它们是燃烧伤害后的两个最常见的挑战,并且可能是最难以治疗的挑战。先前研究了经颅直流刺激(TDC)作为调节疼痛相关神经电路的方法。因此,我们旨在测试TDC对烧伤后神经病变疼痛和瘙痒的影响,了解这是否会诱导对这两个感官表现的同时调制。我们进行了由两种活性或假M1 TDC的试验组合的试点(第I阶段:10阶段,然后是8周的后续期间;第II期:另外5次会议,然后是8个后续期间几周,最后一次访问基线12个月)。通过短暂的疼痛库存(BPI)评估疼痛水平,并通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估瘙痒严重程度。在基线上收集测量,在刺激期后,2,4和8周,在I和II期,最后一次访问。十六名患者被分配给活性组和15名至假组合。活跃TDC的十次会话没有减少疼痛或瘙痒的水平。我们确定在假TDCS会话后的2周随访时瘙痒水平降低,而活性组没有发现安慰剂效应。疼痛观察到活性和假组之间的差异。在II期期间没有发现任何治疗效果。基于这些发现,似乎在假TDC用于瘙痒期间发生了重要的安慰剂效果,而活性ML TDC似乎扰乱了感官补偿机制。我们假设疼痛和瘙痒在烧伤后疼痛感觉损伤后疼痛和瘙痒是互补的,但不同的适应机制,并且需要以不同的方式治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号