...
首页> 外文期刊>Nature reviews Cancer >Beyond the Cambridge Compromise algorithm towards degressively proportional allocations
【24h】

Beyond the Cambridge Compromise algorithm towards degressively proportional allocations

机译:超越剑桥妥协算法,朝着出差的比例分配

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Although proportional allocation methods are well-known and widely used in the parliamentary tradition, they cannot be applied in a wide variety of cases. Such problems occur in the European Parliament, where a constitutional principle is to assure that less populous countries will not be dominated by the others, which implies that allocations have to be degressively proportional. However, under this assumption an exhaustive search of the solution space is intractable. To solve the problem, the Cambridge Compromise algorithm was proposed, which is durable, transparent, impartial to politics and unambiguous, but the allocations obtained are not degressively proportional. Therefore, we propose an allocation algorithm derived from operations research that inherits the transparency of the Cambridge Compromise and produces an unambiguous degressively proportional allocation. Hence, the paper aims at testing our alternative allocation method and comparing its outcomes during computational analysis.
机译:虽然比例分配方法是众所周知和广泛应用于议会的传统,但它们不能在各种情况下应用。这些问题发生在欧洲议会中,宪法原则是确保人口众多国家不会被其他国家统治,这意味着拨款必须出差地比例。然而,在这种假设下,解决方案空间的详尽搜索是棘手的。为了解决问题,提出了剑桥折衷算法,这是耐用的,透明的,对政治和明确的公正公正,但获得的分配并不导出成比例。因此,我们提出了一种从操作研究中衍生的分配算法,其继承了剑桥妥协的透明度,并产生明确的消耗比例分配。因此,本文旨在测试我们的替代分配方法并在计算分析期间比较其结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号