首页> 外文期刊>Current medical research and opinion >The analgesic effect of etoricoxib relative to that of cetaminophen analgesics: a randomized, controlled single-dose study in acute dental impaction pain.
【24h】

The analgesic effect of etoricoxib relative to that of cetaminophen analgesics: a randomized, controlled single-dose study in acute dental impaction pain.

机译:依托昔布的镇痛效果相对于西他米酚的镇痛效果:一项针对急性牙嵌痛的随机对照单剂量研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: To compare the analgesic effect of single doses of etoricoxib 120 mg, oxycodone/ acetaminophen 10 mg/650 mg and codeine/ acetaminophen 60 mg/600 mg in acute pain using the dental impaction model. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, patients reported pain intensity and pain relief (16 times) and global scores (twice) during a 24-h period. The primary endpoint was the overall analgesic effect, total pain relief over 6 h (TOPAR6). Other endpoints were patient global evaluation, time to onset (2-stopwatch method), duration of analgesic effect (median time to and amount of rescue medication use). Tolerability was evaluated by overall and opioid-related (nausea and vomiting) adverse experiences. RESULTS: 302 patients (mean age 23; 63% women; 63 % White) were randomized to etoricoxib 120 mg, oxycodone/acetaminophen 10 mg/650 mg, codeine/acetaminophen 60 mg/600 mg, and placebo (2:2:1:1). Etoricoxib demonstrated significantly greater overall analgesicefficacy (TOPAR6) (13.2 units) versus oxycodone/acetaminophen (10.2 units); and codeine/acetaminophen (6.0 units); p < 0.001 for all. All active treatments were superior to placebo. Median time to onset was significantly (p < 0.001) shorter for oxycodone/acetaminophen (20 min) and numerically but not significantly shorter (p = 0.259) for codeine/acetaminophen (26 min) compared with etoricoxib (40 min). Etoricoxib (24 h) had a significantly longer lasting analgesic effect than oxycodone/acetaminophen (5.3 h), codeine/acetaminophen (2.7 h), and placebo (1.7 h) (p < 0.001 for all). Etoricoxib patients experienced fewer clinical adverse experiences than patients on oxycodone/acetaminophen and codeine/acetaminophen, specifically, significantly (p < 0.05) fewer episodes of nausea. CONCLUSION: Etoricoxib 120 mg provided superior overall analgesic effect with a smaller percentage of patients experiencing nausea versus both oxycodone/acetaminophen 10 mg/650 mg and codeine/acetaminophen 60 mg/600 mg.
机译:背景:为了比较单次使用依托昔布120 mg,羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚10 mg / 650 mg和可待因/对乙酰氨基酚60 mg / 600 mg在牙科疼痛模型中的镇痛效果。方法:在这项随机,双盲,安慰剂对照,平行组研究中,患者在24小时内报告了疼痛强度和疼痛缓解(16次)和总体评分(两次)。主要终点为总体镇痛作用,在6小时内可完全缓解疼痛(TOPAR6)。其他终点是患者总体评估,起效时间(2-秒表法),镇痛作用的持续时间(中位时间和急救药物的使用量)。通过总体和阿片类药物相关(恶心和呕吐)不良反应评估耐受性。结果:302例患者(平均年龄23; 63%的女性; 63%的白人)被随机分为依托昔布120 mg,羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚10 mg / 650 mg,可待因/对乙酰氨基酚60 mg / 600 mg和安慰剂(2:2:1 :1)。与羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚(10.2单位)相比,依托昔布的总体镇痛效果(TOPAR6)(13.2单位)明显更高;和可待因/对乙酰氨基酚(6.0单位);所有的p <0.001。所有积极治疗均优于安慰剂。与依托昔布(40 min)相比,羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚(20 min)的中位起效时间明显缩短(p <0.001),而可待因/对乙酰氨基酚(26 min)的数值却没有显着缩短(p = 0.259)。与羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚(5.3 h),可待因/对乙酰氨基酚(2.7 h)和安慰剂(1.7 h)相比,依托昔布(24 h)具有明显更长的持续镇痛作用(全部p <0.001)。与使用羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚和可待因/对乙酰氨基酚的患者相比,依托昔布患者的临床不良经历更少,特别是恶心发作的发生率显着减少(p <0.05)。结论:与羟考酮/对乙酰氨基酚10 mg / 650 mg和可待因/对乙酰氨基酚60 mg / 600 mg相比,120 mg依托昔布提供了更好的总体镇痛效果,并且较少的恶心患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号