...
首页> 外文期刊>Medical Physics >TH‐AB‐202‐05: BEST IN PHYSICS (JOINT IMAGING‐THERAPY): First Online Ultrasound‐Guided MLC Tracking for Real‐Time Motion Compensation in Radiotherapy
【24h】

TH‐AB‐202‐05: BEST IN PHYSICS (JOINT IMAGING‐THERAPY): First Online Ultrasound‐Guided MLC Tracking for Real‐Time Motion Compensation in Radiotherapy

机译:Th-AB-202-05:最佳物理(联合影像治疗):首先在线超声引导的MLC跟踪,用于放射治疗中的实时运动补偿

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose: While MLC tracking has been successfully used for motion compensation of moving targets, current real‐time target localization methods rely on correlation models with x‐ray imaging or implanted electromagnetic transponders rather than direct target visualization. In contrast, ultrasound imaging yields volumetric data in real‐time (4D) without ionizing radiation. We report the first results of online 4D ultrasound‐guided MLC tracking in a phantom. Methods: A real‐time tracking framework was installed on a 4D ultrasound station (Vivid7 dimension, GE) and used to detect a 2mm spherical lead marker inside a water tank. The volumetric frame rate was 21.3Hz (47ms). The marker was rigidly attached to a motion stage programmed to reproduce nine tumor trajectories (five prostate, four lung). The 3D marker position from ultrasound was used for real‐time MLC aperture adaption. The tracking system latency was measured and compensated by prediction for lung trajectories. To measure geometric accuracy, anterior and lateral conformal fields with 10cm circular aperture were delivered for each trajectory. The tracking error was measured as the difference between marker position and MLC aperture in continuous portal imaging. For dosimetric evaluation, 358° VMAT fields were delivered to a biplanar diode array dosimeter using the same trajectories. Dose measurements with and without MLC tracking were compared to a static reference dose using a 3%/3 mm γ‐test. Results: The tracking system latency was 170ms. The mean root‐mean‐square tracking error was 1.01mm (0.75mm prostate, 1.33mm lung). Tracking reduced the mean γ‐failure rate from 13.9% to 4.6% for prostate and from 21.8% to 0.6% for lung with high‐modulation VMAT plans and from 5% (prostate) and 18% (lung) to 0% with low modulation. Conclusion: Real‐time ultrasound tracking was successfully integrated with MLC tracking for the first time and showed similar accuracy and latency as other methods while holding the potential to measure target motion non‐invasively. SI was supported by the Graduate School for Computing in Medicine and Life Science, German Excellence Initiative [grant DFG GSC 235/1].
机译:目的:虽然MLC跟踪已成功用于移动目标的运动补偿,但目前的实时目标定位方法依赖于具有X射线成像或植入电磁转发器的相关模型而不是直接目标可视化。相反,超声成像在实时(4D)中产生体积数据而不电离辐射。我们在幻影中报告了在线4D超声引导MLC跟踪的第一个结果。方法:在4D超声站(Vivid7尺寸,GE)上安装了实时跟踪框架,并用于检测水箱内的2mm球形引线标记。体积帧速率为21.3Hz(47ms)。标记刚性地附着在编程为再现9个肿瘤轨迹(五个前列腺,四肺)的运动阶段。来自超声波的3D标记位置用于实时MLC孔径适配。通过对肺轨迹的预测来测量和补偿跟踪系统延迟。为了测量具有10cm圆形孔的前部和横向保形场被输送为每个轨迹。将跟踪误差测量为连续门网成像中标记位置和MLC孔之间的差异。对于剂量测定,使用相同的轨迹将358°VMAT字段输送到双向二极管阵列剂量计。将使用3%/3mmγ-Test的静态参考剂量进行比较具有和不使用MLC跟踪的剂量测量。结果:跟踪系统延迟为170ms。平均均方方的跟踪误差为1.01mm(前列腺,1.33mm肺部)。跟踪将平均γ破坏率降低到前列腺的13.9%至4.6%,高调制VMAT计划的21.8%至0.6%,5%(前列腺)和18%(肺)达0%,低调制。结论:实时超声跟踪首次与MLC跟踪成功集成,并显示了类似的准确度和延迟,同时保持潜在的潜在侵入性测量目标运动。 SI得到了医学和生命科学计算的研究生院的支持,德国卓越倡议[Grant DFG GSC 235/1]。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号