首页> 外文期刊>Forest Ecology and Management >Can group selection with legacy retention change compositional trajectories in conventionally managed hardwoods?
【24h】

Can group selection with legacy retention change compositional trajectories in conventionally managed hardwoods?

机译:可以在常规管理硬木中进行遗留保留变化组成轨迹的组合选择吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Group selection has been proposed as a complementary system to conventional, uneven-aged management in temperate hardwoods (i.e. single-tree selection) to counteract declines in overstory diversity and growing importance of shade-tolerant species caused largely by past management activities. Mixed results from experimental group selection harvests in eastern North America and growing interest in retention forestry have led some scientists and managers to apply ideas from retention forestry into group selection systems. The Yellow Birch Legacy-Tree Project is a group selection experiment established in 2003, which incorporates single, dominant/co-dominant yellow birch (Betula alleghaniensis Britt.) legacy-trees into the centers of harvested canopy gaps in a northern hardwoods forest in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. Group selection openings (n = 49) in three size classes based upon radii-small (11 m, n = 16), medium (16.5 m, n = 17), and large (22 m, n = 16)-were surveyed alongside single-tree selection reference sites (n = 20) 15 years post-harvest. Our goals were to (1) examine long-term trends in seedling and sapling abundance and diversity, (2) evaluate the initial and contemporary effects of gap size on regeneration, and (3) assess the overall efficacy of group-selection with legacy-tree retention in regenerating mid-tolerant and intolerant species, especially yellow birch. At 15 years post-harvest, we found that shade-tolerant sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.) dominated regeneration layers across all treatments, but we observed modest increases in seedling and sapling diversity within openings that may alter long-term canopy composition over several cutting cycles. We found that gains in diversity and evenness in canopy gaps persisted through time and that large gaps (22 m radius) had the most species-rich and diverse regeneration compared to reference sites. Canopy gaps contained significantly higher densities of shade-intolerant and mid-tolerant seedlings and saplings compared to reference sites, namely red maple (Acer rubrum L.), black cherry (Prunus serotina Ehrh.), and yellow birch; however, most diversity occurred in shorter height classes. Nevertheless, legacy retention within group selection systems holds promise for maintaining ecological memory and structural complexity through time, but further treatments such as scarification may be necessary to shift compositional trajectories in favor of shade-intolerant and mid-tolerant species.
机译:已经提出了集团选择作为传统的互补系统,在温带硬木(即单树选择)中的常规,不均匀的管理,以抵消逾野多样性的下降,并且越来越重要的抗菌物种在很大程度上因过去的管理活动而导致的抗菌物种。 Eastern America的实验组选择中的混合结果是在东北美国的收获以及对保留林业的兴趣越来越多地导致了一些科学家和经理,将思想从保留林业应用于集团选择系统。黄桦木遗产树计划是成立于2003年的一组筛选试验,其采用了单一的,占主导地位/共显性黄色的桦树(桦alleghaniensis布里特)遗留树进入收获冠空隙在北方的硬木森林中的中心密歇根州上半岛。基于半径 - 小(11μm,n = 16),培养基(16.5m,n = 17),大(22米,n = 16) - 与旁边的大(22μm,n = 16) - 旁边的三个尺寸类别(n = 49)。收获后15年的单树选择参考网站(n = 20)。我们的目标是(1)审查苗木和树苗丰富和多样性的长期趋势,(2)评估差距大小对再生的初始和当代影响,并评估组合与遗产的整体疗效 - 再生中耐和物种,特别是黄桦树的树保持。 15年后,收获后,我们发现在所有的治疗为主的再生层是耐荫的糖槭(糖槭沼泽。),但我们观察到的开口内幼苗幼树多样性适度增加可能改变长期的树冠组成了几切割循环。我们发现,与参考地点相比,通过时间持续存在的多样性和均匀性的多样性和均匀性持续存在,并且与参考地点相比,具有大多数物种丰富和多样化的再生。与参考地点相比,天覆差距含有显着更高的遮阳性和中间幼苗和树苗密度,即红槭(宏碁Rubrum L.),黑樱桃(PrunusSerotina EHRH)和黄桦;但是,大多数多样性发生在较短的高度类别中。尽管如此,在组选择系统内的传统保留具有通过时间维持生态记忆和结构性复杂性的承担承担,但是可能需要进一步的处理来改变组成轨迹,以支持阴影 - 不宽容和中间耐受的物种。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Forest Ecology and Management》 |2019年第2019期|共13页
  • 作者单位

    Michigan Technol Univ Sch Forest Resources &

    Environm Sci 1400 Townsend Dr Houghton MI 49931 USA;

    Michigan Technol Univ Sch Forest Resources &

    Environm Sci 1400 Townsend Dr Houghton MI 49931 USA;

    USDA Forest Serv Northern Res Stn 5985 Highway K Rhinelander WI 54501 USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 林业;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-19 17:15:12

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号