...
首页> 外文期刊>Forest Ecology and Management >Post-fire resprouting capacity of seasonally dry forest species - Two quantitative indices
【24h】

Post-fire resprouting capacity of seasonally dry forest species - Two quantitative indices

机译:季节性干燥林种后火灾清洗能力 - 两种量化指数

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Qualitative measures of resprouting capacity often fail to capture inter- and intra-species variation, whereas available quantitative methods can be complex and time-consuming, hindering broad-scale comparative studies. Here, we propose two quantitative indices that can be applied in a standard way in different regions. We sampled 1046 plants of 20 dominant species (6 shrubs, 7 trees and 7 tree/shrubs) from the seasonally dry forests of the arid Chaco, central-western Argentina. Sampling was conducted in burned field sites one growing season after fire. For each sampled plant we measured the diameter of the main burned trunk (MTD) and main resprout (MRD), and the number of burned trunks (TN) and resprouts (RN); we then built estimated composite diameters for trunks and resprouts (ECTD and ECRD) and we calculated two alternative Resprouting Capacity Indices: RCI 1 (ECRD/ECTD); and RCI 2 (MRD/MTD). The indices were validated against a measure of Resprouting Vigour (RV) that included detailed measurement of all trunks and resprouts for a subset of sampled plants. In all cases, variables indicative of fire severity were measured and included in the analyses. The RCIs and RV were highly related, both at the species and growth form levels. Fire severity had no significant effect on these relationships, but growth form affected RCI 2. All species were capable of resprouting, showing considerable inter-species variation for the two proposed RCIs. Species rank differed considerably between RCIs and survival-only estimations. RCI 1 was higher in tree/shrubs (i.e. species regarded as trees or shrubs) and trees than in shrubs. All species showed decreasing resprouting capacity with increasing ECTD. Our results support the use of the proposed RCIs as a robust tool to assess resprouting capacity, providing more details than survival-based assessments. Choosing one or the other implies a trade-off between accuracy and simplicity, and may depend on the scale and objective of the study, and resprouting patterns of studied species. Species, growth form and individual plant size are relevant in explaining post-fire resprouting capacity and survival.
机译:改性能力的定性测量通常无法捕获物种间变异,而可用的定量方法可以复杂且耗时,妨碍广泛的比较研究。在这里,我们提出了两个可以以不同地区的标准方式应用的两个定量指标。我们从中西部阿根廷干旱Chaco的季节性干燥森林中取样了1046株植物(6灌木,7棵树和7棵树/灌木)。在火灾后,在烧毁的田地网站中进行了抽样。对于每个采样的植物,我们测量了主要燃烧的躯干(MTD)和主REPROUT(MRD)的直径,以及烧毁的树干(TN)和RESPROUT的数量(RN);然后,我们建立了估计的中继线和RESPROUT(ECTD和ECRD)的复合直径,并计算了两种替代注入容量指标:RCI 1(ECRD / ECTD);和RCI 2(MRD / MTD)。依据验证了衡量RESPRUTING活力(RV)的衡量标准,其中包括对采样植物的子集的所有树干和REMPROUT的详细测量。在所有情况下,测量指示火灾严重程度的变量并包括在分析中。 RCI和RV在物种和生长形式水平上具有高度相关。火灾严重程度对这些关系没有显着影响,但增长形式受影响RCI 2.所有物种都能够重新排出,显示出两种提出的RCIS的相当大的物种间变异。物种等级在RCI和仅生存的估算之间有很大不同。 RCI 1在树/灌木(即,被视为树木或灌木)和树木而不是在灌木中的树木。所有物种都表现出随着ECT的增加降低了改造能力。我们的结果支持使用所提出的RCIS作为评估RESPROUTING能力的强大工具,提供比生存的评估更多的细节。选择一个或另一个意味着准确性和简单性之间的权衡,并且可能取决于研究的规模和目标,以及研究的物种的注释模式。物种,生长形式和个体植物规模在解释后的消除后的清洗能力和生存中是相关的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号