首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Operational Research >Entropic risk measures and their comparative statics in portfolio selection: Coherence vs. convexity
【24h】

Entropic risk measures and their comparative statics in portfolio selection: Coherence vs. convexity

机译:熵风险措施及其在组合选择中的比较估计:连贯与凸起

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Highlights?We compare coherent and convex entropic risk measures in portfolio selection.?For both risk measures, risk-taking may be increasing with increasing risk aversion.?Under the coherent version, risk-taking increases when a background risk arises.?Under the convex version, background risk has no effect on risk-taking.AbstractWe conduct a decision-theoretic analysis of optimal portfolio choices and, in particular, their comparative statics under two types of entropic risk measures, the coherent entropic risk measure (CERM) and the convex entropic risk measure (ERM). Starting with the portfolio selection between a risky and a risk free asset (framework of Arrow (1965) and Pratt (1964)), we find a restrictive all-or-nothing investment decision under the CERM, while the ERM yields diversification. We then address a portfolio problem with two risky assets, and
机译:<![cdata [ 突出显示 我们比较投资组合选择中的一致性和凸熵风险措施。 对于风险措施,风险可能会随着风险的增加而增加厌恶。 在相干版本下,当出现后台风险时,风险增加。 根据该凹凸版,背景风险对冒险没有影响 抽象 我们开展了最佳组合选择的决策学分析,特别是它们的比较估计两种类型的熵风险措施,相干熵风险措施(CERM)和凸熵风险措施(ERM)。从投资组合选择的投资组合和无风险资产(箭头(1965)和普拉特(1964)的框架之间开始,我们在CERM下发现了限制的全无或没有任何投资决策,而ERM产生多样化。然后,我们解决了两个风险资产的投资组合问题

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号