首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Operational Research >Performance assessment in homogeneous/heterogeneous collaborative enterprise networks with inventory adjustment
【24h】

Performance assessment in homogeneous/heterogeneous collaborative enterprise networks with inventory adjustment

机译:具有库存调整的同质/异构协同企业网络中的性能评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Globalization has not only reduced product prices but also increased product and service availability. As a result, demand and inventory reallocation between collaborative enterprise network (CEN) members has become essential to improve performance and competitiveness. Previous research focused on decentralized collaboration and partner selection, with an emphasis on inventory management and demand allocation. However, balanced reallocation strategies with benefits in every period for all network members have not been studied sufficiently. Hence, we have proposed the Proportional Inventory Deficit Satisfaction Algorithm (PIDSA), which supports more efficient inventory- and demand-sharing among all members through balanced collaboration based on single enterprise and network characteristics. The performance of PIDSA has been validated and analyzed by comparing three models: No Collaboration (NC); Partial Collaboration (PC); and Complete Collaboration (CC). Both PC and CC follow PIDSA, but only CC uses inventory adjustments. As CC has a higher collaboration level than NC and PC, we expected CC always to outperform others. However, experimental results show that this is not the fact. It can be concluded that the level of collaboration should be changeable and be dependent on network conditions. It implies that proper collaboration modes should be applied to maximize the performance of different CEN configurations. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:全球化不仅减少了产品价格,而且还增加了产品和服务可用性。因此,协同企业网络(CEN)成员之间的需求和库存重新分配对提高性能和竞争力至关重要。以前的研究侧重于分散的协作和合作伙伴选择,重点是库存管理和需求分配。然而,所有网络成员的每个时期的平衡重新分配策略尚未充分研究。因此,我们提出了按比例库存赤字满意算法(PIDSA),通过基于单一企业和网络特征的平衡协作,通过平衡协作支持所有成员的更有效的库存和需求共享。通过比较三种模型(NC),通过比较了PIDSA的性能并进行了验证和分析;部分协作(PC);并完成合作(CC)。 PC和CC都关注PIDSA,但只有CC使用库存调整。由于CC具有比NC和PC更高的合作水平,我们预期的CC总是始终以胜过他人。然而,实验结果表明这不是事实。可以得出结论,合作水平应该是可变的,并取决于网络条件。它意味着应该应用适当的协作模式来最大化不同CEN配置的性能。 (c)2017年Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号