...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Science and Pollution Research >Radiological risk assessment in the terrestrial ecosystem: comparative study of two software tools used for dose rate calculations
【24h】

Radiological risk assessment in the terrestrial ecosystem: comparative study of two software tools used for dose rate calculations

机译:陆地生态系统的放射性风险评估:用于剂量率计算的两种软件工具的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this study, two software tools, namely the ERICA Assessment Tool and the RESRAD-BIOTA code, are used for the calculation of the radiological exposure of non-human organisms. For the purposes of the analysis, data retrieved from field studies are used. The site-specific measurements were performed on organisms (mammals-sheep and goats of Bovidae spp.) collected from free-ranged grazing regions in Greece. Plants (grass) of Poaceae spp. and soil samples were also collected from these regions. Natural radionuclides (~(226)Ra, ~(228)Ra, and ~(228)Th) of lithogenic origin and ~(137)Cs, resulted from human activities (Chernobyl and Fukushima nuclear power plant accidents and global fallout), were detected in all samples. The measured activity concentrations were used as input to the two software tools, the ERICA Assessment Tool and the RESRAD-BIOTA code. The results of the simulations provided the external, internal, and total dose rates received by the organisms due to the exposure to the radionuclides. The assessments indicated that out of all detected radionuclides, ~(228)Th is the main contributor to the external dose and ~(226)Raand ~(228)Ra are the main contributors to the internal dose. The comparative analysis of the two tools revealed significant differences in the calculated doses. In fact, external and internal doses calculated by RESRAD-BIOTA are higher than the values calculated by the ERICA Tool, due to the dose conversion coefficients (DCCs) used for the dose calculation. RESRAD-BIOTA provides more conservative values, but ERICA Tool provides lower uncertainty due to the higher flexibility in the design of the phantom organism. On a risk assessment basis, there is no significant impact, due to organisms' exposure to radioactivity. However, further consideration of the exposure levels is required due to the potential effects of protracted low-level ionizing radiation on the various levels of life's organization.
机译:在本研究中,两个软件工具,即Erica评估工具和Resrad-Biota代码,用于计算非人生物的放射性暴露。出于分析的目的,使用从现场研究中检索的数据。在从希腊自由范围的放牧地区收集的生物体(哺乳动物 - 绵羊和山羊的生物体(哺乳动物 - 绵羊和山羊)进行了特异性测量。 Poaceae SPP的植物(草)。还从这些地区收集土壤样品。自然放射性核素(〜(226)Ra,〜(228)Ra,和〜(228)〜〜(228)Cs,由人类活动(切尔诺贝利和福岛核电站事故和全球辐射)产生的〜(137)Cs在所有样本中检测到。测量的活性浓度用作两个软件工具,Erica评估工具和Resrad-Biota代码的输入。由于暴露于放射性核素,模拟的结果提供了生物体所接收的外部,内部和总剂量率。评估表明,出于所有检测到的放射性核素,〜(228)TH是外部剂量的主要因素,〜(226)Raand〜(228)Ra是内部剂量的主要贡献者。两种工具的比较分析显示了计算剂量的显着差异。实际上,由于用于剂量计算的剂量转化系数(DCCS),由Resrad-Biota计算的外部和内剂量高于Erica工具计算的值。 Resrad-Biota提供了更保守的值,但由于幻影有机体设计的灵活性较高,Erica工具可以降低不确定性。在风险评估基础上,由于生物体暴露于放射性,没有显着影响。然而,由于持续的低级电离辐射对各种生活组织的潜在影响,需要进一步考虑曝光率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号