首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Modern Physics, B. Condensed Matter Physics, Statistical Physics, Applied Physics >Towards the representation of groundwater in the Joint UK Land Environment Simulator
【24h】

Towards the representation of groundwater in the Joint UK Land Environment Simulator

机译:朝着英国陆地环境模拟器联合地下水的代表

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Groundwater is an important component of the hydrological cycle with significant interactions with soil hydrological processes. Recent studies have demonstrated that incorporating groundwater hydrology in land surface models (LSMs) considerably improves the prediction of the partitioning of water components (e.g., runoff and evapotranspiration) at the land surface. However, the Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES), an LSM developed in the United Kingdom, does not yet have an explicit representation of groundwater. We propose an implementation of a simplified groundwater flow boundary parameterization (JULES-GFB), which replaces the original free drainage assumption in the default model (JULES-FD). We tested the two approaches under a controlled environment for various soil types using two synthetic experiments: (1) single-column and (2) tilted-V catchment, using a three-dimensional (3-D) hydrological model (ParFlow) as a benchmark for JULES' performance. In addition, we applied our new JULES-GFB model to a regional domain in the UK, where groundwater is the key element for runoff generation. In the single-column infiltration experiment, JULES-GFB showed improved soil moisture dynamics in comparison with JULES-FD, for almost all soil types (except coarse soils) under a variety of initial water table depths. In the tilted-V catchment experiment, JULES-GFB successfully represented the dynamics and the magnitude of saturated and unsaturated storage against the benchmark. The lateral water flow produced by JULES-GFB was about 50% of what was produced by the benchmark, while JULES-FD completely ignores this process. In the regional domain application, the Kling-Gupta efficiency (KGE) for the total runoff simulation showed an average improvement from 0.25 for JULES-FD to 0.75 for JULES-GFB. The mean bias of actual evapotranspiration relative to the Global Land Evaporation Amsterdam Model (GLEAM) product was improved from -0.22 to -0.01 mm day(-1). Our new JULES-GFB implementation provides an opportunity to better understand the interactions between the subsurface and land surface processes that are dominated by groundwater hydrology.
机译:地下水与土壤水文过程显著相互作用的水文循环的重要组成部分。最近的研究已经证明,在陆面模型(LSMS)将地下水水文显着地改善在地表水组分(例如,径流和蒸散)的划分的预测。然而,联合英国土地环境模拟器(朱尔斯),在英国开发的LSM,还没有地下水的明确表示。我们提出了一个简化的地下水流边界参数(儒勒 - GFB),它取代默认的模型(儒勒 - FD)的原始自由排水假设的实现。我们使用两种合成实验中测试的各种土壤类型的受控环境下的两种方法:(1)单柱和(2)倾斜-V集水,使用三维(3-d)水文模型(ParFlow),为基准朱尔斯性能。此外,我们应用我们的新儒勒 - GFB模型,在英国,在那里地下水径流发电的关键要素区域域。在单柱浸润实验,JULES-GFB显示出改善的土壤水分动态与JULES-FD比较,在各种初始水位深处的几乎所有土壤类型(除了粗粒土)。在倾斜-V集水实验,JULES-GFB成功表示的动力学和针对基准饱和和不饱和的存储的大小。通过JULES-GFB产生的横向水流是关于什么是由基准产生的50%,而JULES-FD完全忽略了这个过程。在区域域的应用中,克林-古普塔效率(KGE)总径流模拟显示从0.25 JULES-FD〜0.75的平均改进JULES-GFB。相对于全球陆地蒸发阿姆斯特丹模型(GLEAM)产品实际蒸散量的平均偏离值由-0.22 - -0.01毫米日益好转(-1)。我们的新儒勒 - GFB实现提供了一个机会,以更好地了解由地下水水文学为主的地下和地表过程之间的相互作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号