首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Oncology >Maximum-tolerated dose, optimum biologic dose, or optimum clinical value: Dosing determination of cancer therapies
【24h】

Maximum-tolerated dose, optimum biologic dose, or optimum clinical value: Dosing determination of cancer therapies

机译:最大耐受剂量,最佳生物剂量或最佳临床价值:癌症治疗的剂量确定

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

One of the key goals of early-phase cancer clinical trials is to determine the best dose of a drug to take forward into subsequent, outcomes-oriented, clinical trials. Typically, once a dose and schedule are recommended for phase II and III trials, we rarely, if ever, go back to explore alternatives. We then assume a one-size-fits-all dosing of our drugs, modifying only using our traditional mg/m2 or mg/kg dosing approaches, neither of which have solid pharmacologic rationale themselves,1 and ignore any personalized medicine approach. Instead of pausing after phase I to refine our understanding of how to choose the right dose and schedule for a given patient, we push forward as quickly as possible, urgently moving toward the critical phase III trial—the straightest line between drug discovery and approval. We do this because in today s world, finding a small benefit among a large patient population is often enough to obtain regulatory approval and to influence equally important practice guidelines.
机译:早期癌症临床试验的主要目标之一是确定药物的最佳剂量,以进行后续的,注重结果的临床试验。通常,一旦为II期和III期试验推荐了剂量和时间表,我们很少(如果有的话)回去探索替代方案。然后,我们假设我们的药物是一种“万能药”,仅使用我们传统的mg / m2或mg / kg剂量给药方法进行修改,而这两种方法本身都没有可靠的药理学原理1,并且忽略了任何个性化的药物治疗方法。我们不会暂停第一阶段,以使我们更好地了解如何为特定患者选择正确的剂量和时间表,而是尽快推进,紧急转向关键的第三阶段试验,这是药物发现与批准之间的最直接方法。我们这样做是因为在当今世界上,在大量患者中发现较小的收益通常足以获得监管部门的批准并影响同样重要的实践准则。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号