首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Oncology >Temozolomide in combination with interferon-alfa versus temozolomide alone in patients with advanced metastatic melanoma: a randomized, phase III, multicenter study from the Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group.
【24h】

Temozolomide in combination with interferon-alfa versus temozolomide alone in patients with advanced metastatic melanoma: a randomized, phase III, multicenter study from the Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group.

机译:晚期转移性黑色素瘤患者中替莫唑胺与干扰素-阿尔法的组合与替莫唑胺的单独应用:皮肤科合作肿瘤学组的一项随机,III期,多中心研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: Temozolomide (TMZ) has shown efficacy in metastatic melanoma equal to that of dacarbazine (DTIC), the standard chemotherapeutic agent for melanoma. As the combination with interferon-alfa (IFN-alpha) appears superior to single-agent DTIC regarding response rates, the purpose of this study was to compare TMZ alone and TMZ plus IFN-alpha in terms of objective response (OR), overall survival, and safety in a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred ninety-four patients with untreated stage IV metastatic melanoma (American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system) were randomly assigned to receive either oral TMZ alone (200 mg/m2/day; days 1 through 5 every 28 days) or in combination with subcutaneous IFN-alpha (5 MU/m2; days 1, 3, and 5 every week). RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-two patients were eligible for an intent-to-treat analysis, 271 patients were treated per protocol. In the TMZ + IFN-alpha arm, 33 (24.1%) of 137 patients responded to therapy (partial or complete remission) whereas in the monotherapy arm, in 18 (13.4%) of 134 patients, a response was evident. Thus, the response rate was significantly higher in the combination arm (P = .036). Median survival time was 8.4 months for patients treated with TMZ (95% CI, 7.07 to 9.27) and 9.7 months for those treated with the combination (95% CI, 8.26 to 11.18; P = .16). Dose modifications and interval prolongations due to hematologic toxicity were significantly more frequent in the TMZ + IFN-alpha arm (P < .001). CONCLUSION: In metastatic melanoma treatment with TMZ + IFN-alpha leads to a significantly superior OR rate compared to treatment with TMZ alone, which did not translate into prolonged survival in our study population.
机译:目的:替莫唑胺(TMZ)在转移性黑色素瘤中显示出与达卡巴嗪(DTIC)相同的功效,达卡巴嗪(DTIC)是一种用于黑色素瘤的标准化学治疗剂。由于与干扰素-α(IFN-α)的组合在应答率方面似乎优于单药DTIC,因此本研究的目的是比较客观应答(OR),总体生存率方面的TMZ单独和TMZ加IFN-α ,以及一项前瞻性,随机,多中心试验中的安全性。患者与方法:294名未经治疗的IV期转移性黑色素瘤患者(美国癌症分期分期联合委员会)被随机分配为单独接受任一口服TMZ(200 mg / m2 /天;每28天从第1天到第5天)或与皮下IFN-α联合使用(5 MU / m2;每周第1、3和5天)。结果:282例患者符合意向性治疗分析要求,按照方案治疗271例患者。在TMZ +IFN-α组中,有137名患者中有33名(24.1%)对治疗有反应(部分或完全缓解),而在单一治疗组中,有134名患者中的18名(13.4%)有明显反应。因此,联合治疗组的反应率明显更高(P = .036)。使用TMZ治疗的患者(95%CI,7.07至9.27)的中位生存时间为8.4个月,而使用联合治疗的患者(95%CI,8.26至11.18; P = .16),中位生存时间为9.7个月。在TMZ +IFN-α组中,因血液学毒性而引起的剂量修改和间隔延长明显更为频繁(P <.001)。结论:与单独使用TMZ相比,在TMZ +IFN-α转移性黑色素瘤治疗中,OR率显着提高,这并未转化为我们研究人群的延长生存期。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号