...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry >Evaluation of Spectrophotometry and HPLC Methods for Shikimic Acid Determination in Plants: Models in Glyphosate-Resistant and -Susceptible Crops
【24h】

Evaluation of Spectrophotometry and HPLC Methods for Shikimic Acid Determination in Plants: Models in Glyphosate-Resistant and -Susceptible Crops

机译:分光光度法和HPLC方法测定植物中草酸的评价:抗草甘膦和敏感作物的模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Endogenous shikimic acid determinations are routinely used to assess the efficacy of glyphosate in plants. Numerous analytical methods exist in the public domain for the detection of shikimic acid, yet the most commonly cited comprise spectrophotometry and hig-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) methods. This paper compares an HPLC and two spectrophotometric methods (Spec 1 and Spec 2) and assesses the effectiveness in the detection of shikimic acid in the tissues of glyphpsate-treated plants. Furthermore, the study evaluates the versatility of two acid-based shikimic acid extraction methods and assesses the longevity of plant extract samples under different storage conditions. Finally, Spec 1 and Spec 2 are further characterized with respect to (l) the capacity to discern between shikimic acid and chemically related alicyclic hydroxy acids, (2) the stability of the chrqmophore (t_(1/2)), (3) the detection limits, and (4) the cost and simplicity of undertaking the analytical procedure. Overall, spectrophotometric methods were more cost-effective and simpler to execute yet provided a narrower detection limit compared to HPLC. All three methods were specific to shikimic acid and detected the compound in the tissues of glyphosate-susceptible crops, increasing exponentially in concentration within 24 h of glyphosate application and plateauing at approximately 72 h. Spec 1 estimated more shikimic acid in identical plant extract samples compared to Spec 2 and, likewise, HPLC detection was more effective than spectrophotometric determinations. Given the unprecedented global adoption of glyphosate-resistant crops and concomitant use of glyphosate, an effective and accurate assessment of glyphosate efficacy is important. Endogenous shikimic add determinations are instrumental in corroborating the efficacy of glyphosate and therefore have numerous applications in herbicide research and related areas of science as well as resolving many commercial issues as a consequence of glyphosate utilization.
机译:通常使用内源sh草酸测定来评估草甘膦在植物中的功效。在公共领域中存在用于检测sh草酸的多种分析方法,但是最常被引用的包括分光光度法和高压液相色谱法(HPLC)。本文比较了HPLC和两种分光光度法(规范1和规范2),并评估了草甘膦处理过的植物组织中sh草酸的检测效率。此外,该研究评估了两种基于酸的sh草酸提取方法的多功能性,并评估了在不同储存条件下植物提取物样品的寿命。最后,规格1和规格2的进一步特征在于(1)区分sh草酸和化学相关的脂环族羟基酸的能力,(2)荧光团的稳定性(t_(1/2)),(3)检测限,以及(4)进行分析程序的成本和简便性。总体而言,与HPLC相比,分光光度法更具成本效益且易于执行,但提供的检测限更窄。三种方法都对sh草酸具有特异性,并在易受草甘膦的农作物中检测到该化合物,在施用草甘膦后24小时内浓度呈指数增加,并在约72小时达到平稳。规格1估计,与规格2相比,相同植物提取物样品中的sh草酸含量更高,同样,HPLC检测比分光光度法测定更有效。鉴于抗草甘膦作物在全球范围内得到了前所未有的采用,并同时使用了草甘膦,因此,有效,准确地评估草甘膦的功效非常重要。内源性sh草酸的添加测定有助于证实草甘膦的功效,因此在除草剂研究和相关科学领域具有广泛的应用,并解决了由于草甘膦利用而导致的许多商业问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号