首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry >Effects of Manure and Water Applications on 1,3-Dichloropropene and Chloropicrin Emissions in a Field Trial
【24h】

Effects of Manure and Water Applications on 1,3-Dichloropropene and Chloropicrin Emissions in a Field Trial

机译:田间试验中肥料和水的施用对1,3-二氯丙烯和氯霉素排放的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Minimizing fumigant emissions is required for meeting air-quality standards. Application of organic materials to surface soil has been effective in reducing fumigant emissions during laboratory tests, but the potential to reduce emissions in the field has not been adequately evaluated. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of incorporated composted manure with or without water applications on fumigant emissions and the potential impact on pest control efficacy under field conditions. Treatments included a bare-soil control, composted dairy manure at 12.4 and 24.7 Mg ha~(-1), postfumigation intermittent water seals (11 mm water irrigated immediately following fumigation and 4 mm at 12, 24, and 48 h), and incorporation of manure at 12.4 Mg ha~(-1) combined with the water seals or a high-density polyethylene (HDPE) tarp. Telone C35 was shank-applied at 553 kg ha~(-1), and emissions of 1,3-dichloropropene (1,3-D) and chloropicrin (CP) were monitored for 10 days. The results indicate that there was no significant difference in emission peak flux and cumulative emission loss between the control and the 12.4 Mg ha~(-1) manure treatment. The higher manure rate (24.7 Mg ha~(-1)) resulted in lower emission flux and cumulative emission loss than 12.4 Mg ha~(-1) although the differences were only significant for CP. In contrast, the water treatments with or without manure incorporation significantly reduced peak emission rates (80% reduction) and cumulative emission loss (~50% reduction). The manure + HDPE treatment resulted in the lowest CP emissions but slightly higher 1,3-D emissions than the water treatments. Reductions in peak emission from water treatments can be important in reducing the potential acute exposure risks to workers and bystanders. This research demonstrated that incorporation of composted manure alone did not reduce fumigant emissions and effective emission reduction with manure amendment may require higher application rates and/or more effective materials than those used in this study.
机译:为了达到空气质量标准,需要将熏蒸剂排放降至最低。在实验室测试过程中,将有机材料应用于表层土壤可有效减少熏蒸剂排放,但尚未充分评估减少田间排放的潜力。这项研究的目的是确定在田间条件下,无论是否施水,掺入堆肥的肥料对熏蒸剂排放的影响以及对害虫防治功效的潜在影响。处理包括:光秃秃的土壤控制,12.4和24.7 Mg ha〜(-1)的堆肥乳牛粪,熏蒸后的间歇水封(熏蒸后立即灌溉11毫米水,以及在12、24和48 h灌溉4毫米),以及掺入在12.4 Mg ha〜(-1)的压力下结合水封或高密度聚乙烯(HDPE)防水布。 Telone C35在553 kg ha〜(-1)下进行小腿施用,并监测10天的1,3-二氯丙烯(1,3-D)和氯仿(CP)的排放。结果表明,对照和12.4 Mg ha〜(-1)粪肥处理之间的排放峰值通量和累积排放损失没有显着差异。较高的粪肥率(24.7 Mg ha〜(-1))导致排放通量和累积排放损失均低于12.4 Mg ha〜(-1),尽管差异仅对CP显着。相反,有或没有掺入粪肥的水处理显着降低了峰值排放率(减少了80%)和累积排放量损失(减少了约50%)。粪肥+ HDPE处理的CP排放量最低,但1,3-D排放量比水处理略高。减少水处理产生的峰值排放对于减少工人和旁观者的潜在急性暴露风险可能很重要。这项研究表明,单独使用堆肥不会减少熏蒸剂的排放,而通过粪肥改良有效减少排放可能需要比本研究中更高的施用量和/或更有效的材料。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号