首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >ICU bed supply, utilization, and health care spending: An example of demand elasticity
【24h】

ICU bed supply, utilization, and health care spending: An example of demand elasticity

机译:ICU病床供应,利用率和医疗保健支出:需求弹性的一个例子

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Intensive care is a substantial financial burden on the US health care system, with spending on critical illness exceeding $80 billion per year, approximately 3% of all health care spending and nearly 1% of the gross domestic product.1 In contrast, the United Kingdom spends only 0.1% of its gross domestic product on critical care services, with no evidence of worse patient outcomes and similar life expectancies as in the United States.2 Although there are many differences between these 2 countries, one significant difference is intensive care unit (ICU) bed supply. The United States has 25ICU beds per 100 000 people, as compared with 5 per 100 000 in the United Kingdom.3 As a result, ICU case-mix differs substantially. In the United Kingdom, the majority of ICU patients are at high risk for death, whereas in the United States, many patients are admitted to the ICU for observation.4 At the same time, compared with patients in the United Kingdom, substantially more patients in the United States die in the ICU, suggesting that increased bed availability appears to reduce the incentive to keep dying patients out of the ICU.
机译:重症监护是美国医疗保健系统的沉重财务负担,每年用于重症疾病的支出超过800亿美元,约占所有医疗保健支出的3%,占国内生产总值的近1%。1相反,英国重症监护服务仅花费其国内生产总值(GDP)的0.1%,没有证据表明患者的病情恶化和美国的预期寿命相似。2尽管这两个国家/地区之间存在许多差异,但其中一个重大差异是重症监护室( ICU)病床供应。美国每10万人中有25张ICU病床,而英国则为每10万人中有5张病床。3因此,重症监护病房的病例组合大不相同。在英国,大多数ICU患者处于死亡的高风险中,而在美国,许多患者被送入ICU进行观察。4同时,与英国患者相比,患者更多在美国,死于重症监护病房的患者表明,床位数的增加似乎减少了使垂死患者脱离重症监护病房的动机。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号