首页> 外文期刊>JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association >Is universal pediatric lipid screening justified?
【24h】

Is universal pediatric lipid screening justified?

机译:普及儿科脂质筛查是否合理?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Furthermore, moderately strong tracking of a risk factor over time does not translate into high sensitivity and specificity for the risk factor to predict later disease,5 and because the incidence of ischemic heart disease in young to middle-aged adults remains low, even a high sensitivity and specificity would still yield a low positive predictive value across the entire population. In other words, most children identified as having moderate dyslipidemia will not develop premature heart disease. The number of these "false positives," who accrue cost and risk but do not benefit from screening, will increase by expanding family history-directed screening to universal screening. Also, although the cost of a single lipid measure may appear trivial, major costs will ensue from aggregating over the population, thorough workups and long-term intervention. Even in randomized trials, behavioral interventions to achieve modest reductions in LDL-C require substantial resources.
机译:此外,随着时间的推移,对危险因素的中等程度的跟踪并不能转化为对危险因素的高度敏感性和特异性,以预测以后的疾病5,并且因为年轻至中年成年人缺血性心脏病的发生率仍然很低,甚至很高敏感性和特异性仍将在整个人群中产生较低的阳性预测值。换句话说,大多数被确定患有中度血脂异常的儿童不会发展为早发性心脏病。这些“假阳性”会增加成本和风险,但不能从筛查中受益,其数量将会通过将家族史导向的筛查范围扩大到普适筛查而增加。同样,尽管单次脂质测量的成本似乎微不足道,但主要的成本将来自整个人群的汇总,全面的检查和长期干预。即使在随机试验中,为实现LDL-C适度降低的行为干预也需要大量资源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号