【24h】

Complementary health practices

机译:补充保健做法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

presented a number of interesting points in his discussion of the value of research conducted by NCCAM. However, several warrant further discussion. First, advising NCCAM to refrain from funding studies of therapies that lack biological plausibility would be unreasonable. Such action would unnecessarily deny populations timely access to much-needed clinical evidence required to make informed health care decisions. For particularly vulnerable patient populations who might be exposed to unscrupulous health care services or practitioners, such action could have substantial implications for the health and well-being of the patient.
机译:在讨论NCCAM的研究价值时,他提出了许多有趣的观点。但是,有几个值得进一步讨论。首先,建议NCCAM不要为缺乏生物学可行性的疗法提供资金研究。这样的行动将不必要地使人们无法及时获得做出明智的医疗保健决定所需的急需的临床证据。对于可能接触不良医疗保健服务或从业人员的特别脆弱的患者人群,此类行动可能会对患者的健康和福祉产生重大影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号