...
首页> 外文期刊>Vaccine >Association of the use of MMRV in infants by pediatric infectious disease specialists with that of other affiliated providers
【24h】

Association of the use of MMRV in infants by pediatric infectious disease specialists with that of other affiliated providers

机译:儿科传染病专家与其他关联提供者在婴儿中使用MMRV的关联

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: In an effort to maximize vaccine acceptance by minimizing adverse events following immunization associated with fever, including seizures, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended in 2009 the use of measles, mumps and rubella vaccine (MMR) and varicella vaccines (V) given separately (MMR + V) rather than combination MMRV as the first dose of MMR-containing vaccine to infants. We evaluated factors associated with continued administration of MMRV as the first dose in many infants despite the ACIP recommendation. Methods: Children 12 to 23 months of age who received MMRV or MMR+ V between May 1, 2010 and April 30, 2011 were identified. Patient, provider and facility characteristics associated with MMRV or MMR +V administration were analyzed by bivariate and by multilevel multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results: Altogether, 30,017 children received the first dose of MMRV or MMR + V at 12 to 23 months of age between May 1, 2010 and April 30, 2011. Of these, 10.2% received MMRV while 89.8% received MMR + V. MMRV was more likely to be administered to children who were non-compliant with vaccine recommendations at age one (adjusted odds ratio = 1.48, 95%CI = 1.28, 1.71). In addition, administration of MMRV by a Pediatric Infectious Disease specialist affiliated with a clinic was significantly associated with an increased likelihood of administration of MMRV by other providers at that clinic (interval odds ratio 80 = 2.18, 675.94, P(OR > 1) = 95%). Conclusions: These data suggest that while most providers followed the ACIP recommendation to administer MMR and V separately, Pediatric Infectious Disease specialists' vaccination practices may impact compliance with ACIP recommendations by other providers. Further study of the drivers behind the use of MMRV rather than MMR + V as the first dose of measles-containing vaccine is needed to determine if reinforcement or if clarification of ACIP recommendations is needed to elucidate when MMRV might be preferred over MMR + V. (c) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:背景:为了通过最大限度地减少发烧相关的免疫接种后的不良事件(包括癫痫发作)来最大程度地提高疫苗的接受度,免疫实践咨询委员会(ACIP)在2009年建议使用麻疹,腮腺炎和风疹疫苗(MMR)和水痘疫苗( V)单独给婴儿服用(MMR + V),而不是联合MMRV作为含MMR的疫苗。尽管有ACIP建议,我们还是评估了许多婴儿中与继续服用MMRV作为第一剂相关的因素。方法:确定2010年5月1日至2011年4月30日之间接受MMRV或MMR + V治疗的12至23个月的儿童。通过双变量和多级多变量logistic回归分析分析了与MMRV或MMR + V给药相关的患者,提供者和设施特征。结果:在2010年5月1日至2011年4月30日之间,共有30017名儿童在12至23个月大时接受了MMRV或MMR + V治疗。其中,有10.2%的儿童接受了MMRV,而89.8%的儿童接受了MMR +V。一岁时不符合疫苗建议的儿童更可能接受接种(调整后的优势比= 1.48、95%CI = 1.28、1.71)。此外,由该诊所附属的儿科传染病专家管理MMRV与该诊所其他提供者管理MMRV的可能性显着相关(间隔比值比80 = 2.18,675.94,P(OR> 1)= 95%)。结论:这些数据表明,尽管大多数提供者遵循ACIP建议分别管理MMR和V,但是儿科传染病专家的疫苗接种实践可能会影响其他提供者对ACIP建议的遵守情况。需要进一步研究使用MMRV而不是MMR + V作为含麻疹疫苗的第一剂的驱动因素,以确定是否需要加强治疗或是否需要澄清ACIP建议以阐明何时可能首选MMRV优于MMR + V. (c)2014 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号