首页> 外文期刊>Water Science and Technology >Comparative and integrative environmental assessment of advanced wastewater treatment processes based on an average removal of pharmaceuticals
【24h】

Comparative and integrative environmental assessment of advanced wastewater treatment processes based on an average removal of pharmaceuticals

机译:基于平均去除药物的先进废水处理工艺的比较和综合环境评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Pharmaceuticals are normally barely removed by conventional wastewater treatments. Advanced technologies as a post-treatment, could prevent these pollutants reaching the environment and could be included in a centralized treatment plant or, alternatively, at the primary point source, e.g. hospitals, In this study, the environmental impacts of different options, as a function of several advanced treatments as well as the centralized/decentralized implementation options, have been evaluated using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology. In previous publications, the characterization of the toxicity of pharmaceuticals within LCA suffers from high uncertainties. In our study, LCA was therefore only used to quantify the generated impacts (electricity, chemicals, etc.) of different treatment scenarios. These impacts are then weighted by the average removal rate of pharmaceuticals using a new Eco-efficiency Indicator EFI. This new way of comparing the scenarios shows significant advantages of upgrading a centralized plant with ozonation as the post-treatment. The decentralized treatment option reveals no significant improvement on the avoided environmental impact, due to the comparatively small pollutant load coming from the hospital and the uncertainties in the average removal of the decentralized scenarios. When comparing the post-treatment technologies, UV radiation has a lower performance than both ozonation and activated carbon adsorption.
机译:通常,常规的废水处理几乎不能除去药物。作为后处理的先进技术可以防止这些污染物进入环境,并且可以包含在集中式处理厂中,也可以包含在主要污染源中,例如,污水处理厂。医院,在这项研究中,已使用生命周期评估(LCA)方法评估了不同方案对环境的影响,这些方案是几种先进治疗方法以及集中/分散实施方案的函数。在以前的出版物中,LCA中药物毒性的表征存在高度不确定性。因此,在我们的研究中,LCA仅用于量化不同治疗方案所产生的影响(电,化学药品等)。然后,使用新的生态效率指标EFI将这些影响加权为药物的平均去除率。这种比较方案的新方法显示了使用臭氧化作为后处理升级集中式工厂的显着优势。由于来自医院的污染物负荷相对较小以及分散方案的平均清除量不确定,因此分散处理方案并未显示出对避免的环境影响没有明显改善。当比较后处理技术时,紫外线辐射的性能要比臭氧化和活性炭吸附低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号