...
首页> 外文期刊>Transplantation: Official Journal of the Transplantation Society >Humidified High Flow Nasal Cannula Supportive Therapy Improves Outcomes in Lung Transplant Recipients Readmitted to the Intensive Care Unit Because of Acute Respiratory Failure
【24h】

Humidified High Flow Nasal Cannula Supportive Therapy Improves Outcomes in Lung Transplant Recipients Readmitted to the Intensive Care Unit Because of Acute Respiratory Failure

机译:加湿的高流量鼻插管支持疗法可改善因急性呼吸衰竭重新进入重症监护病房的肺移植接受者的结局

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background. The effectiveness of humidified high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in lung transplant (LTx) recipients readmitted to intensive care unit (ICU) because of acute respiratory failure (ARF) has not been determined to date. Methods. Retrospective analysis of a prospectively assessed cohort of LTx patients who were readmitted to ICU because of ARF over a 5-year period. Patients received conventional oxygen therapy (COT) or HFNC (Optiflow, Fisher & Paykel, New Zealand) supportive therapy according to the attending physician's criteria. Treatment failure was defined as the need for subsequent mechanical ventilation (MV). Results. Thirty-seven LTx recipients required ICU readmission, with a total of 40 episodes (18 COT vs. 22 HFNC). At ICU admission, no differences in comorbidities, pulmonary function, or median sequential organ failure assessment (COT, 4 [interquartile range, 4-6] vs. HFNC, 4 [interquartile range, 4-7]; P = 0.51) were observed. Relative risk of MV in patients with COT was 1.50 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.02-2.21). The absolute risk reduction for MV with HFNC was 29.8%, and the number of patients needed to treat to prevent one intubation with HFNC was 3. Multivariate analysis showed that HFNC therapy was the only variable at ICU admission associated with a decreased risk of MV (odds ratio, 0.11 [95% CI, 0.02-0.69]; P = 0.02). Moreover, nonventilated patients had an increased survival rate (20.7% vs. 100%; relative rate 4.83 [95% CI, 2.37-9.86]; P < 0.001). No adverse events were associated with HFNC use. Conclusion. HFNC O2 therapy is feasible and safe and may decrease the need for MV in LTx recipients readmitted to the ICU because of ARF.
机译:背景。迄今为止,尚未确定加湿大流量鼻插管(HFNC)在因急性呼吸衰竭(ARF)而重新进入重症监护病房(ICU)的肺移植(LTx)受者中的有效性。方法。对前瞻性评估的LTx患者的回顾性分析,这些患者在5年内因ARF而重新入ICU。根据主治医师的标准,患者接受了常规的氧疗(COT)或HFNC(新西兰Optiflow,Fisher&Paykel)的支持疗法。治疗失败定义为需要随后的机械通气(MV)。结果。三十七名LTx接受者需要ICU再入院,总共40例(18例COT对22 HFNC)。在ICU入院时,未发现合并症,肺功能或中位顺序器官衰竭评估的差异(COT,4 [四分位间距,4-6]与HFNC,4 [四分位间距,4-7]; P = 0.51) 。 COT患者的MV相对风险为1.50(95%置信区间[95%CI],1.02-2.21)。 HFNC可使MV绝对风险降低29.8%,预防一次HFNC插管所需治疗的患者人数为3。多因素分析显示,HFC治疗是ICU入院时唯一可降低MV风险的变量(比值比为0.11 [95%CI,0.02-0.69]; P = 0.02)。此外,未通气的患者生存率增加(20.7%对100%;相对率4.83 [95%CI,2.37-9.86]; P <0.001)。没有不良事件与使用HFNC相关。结论。 HFNC O2治疗是可行且安全的,并且可以减少因ARF而重新入住ICU的LTx接受者对MV的需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号