首页> 外文期刊>The pharmaceutical journal >Are 'generically equivalent' medicines really pharmaceutically equivalent?
【24h】

Are 'generically equivalent' medicines really pharmaceutically equivalent?

机译:“一般等效”药物真的是等效药物吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A RECENT article in The Pharmaceutical Journal discusses the expiry of the patents on some 46 different medicinal products over the next two years. The general tenor of the piece is to regard this as "a good thing", in view of the savings to the NHS as a consequence of the substitution of generic products for the original branded product.In the current economic climate, anything that reduces these costs is greatly to be welcomed, but only if "the safety, protection and well-being of the patient" is in no way compromised. Thus, the fundamental question is: "Is a generic substitute precisely equivalent to the original branded product, in terms of safety, efficacy and all other relevant aspects?"I have before me examples of generic lisinopril 20mg tablets from three different manufacturers. They are, in appearance, respectively: white, round, biconvex; white, elliptical; dull pink, round, biconvex.
机译:最近,《医药杂志》上的一篇文章讨论了未来两年内约46种不同药品的专利到期。鉴于将通用产品替换为原始品牌产品而为NHS节省的资金,该产品的总体宗旨是将其视为“一件好事”。在当前的经济形势下,减少这些费用的任何措施费用是非常值得欢迎的,但前提是“患者的安全,保护和福祉”丝毫不受影响。因此,根本的问题是:“就安全性,功效和所有其他相关方面而言,通用替代品是否正好等同于原始品牌产品?”我面前有来自三个不同制造商的通用赖诺普利20mg片剂的实例。它们的外观分别是:白色,圆形,双凸;白色,椭圆形暗淡的粉红色,圆形,双凸。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号