首页> 外文期刊>The pharmaceutical journal >Putting patients' needs first only if it suits us?
【24h】

Putting patients' needs first only if it suits us?

机译:仅在适合我们时才将患者的需求放在首位吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The letter from my old friend Brian Curwain (PJ, 6 April 2013, p372) caused me to ponder the ethical and moral dilemmas faced by some pharmacists, especially if one is working as the sole pharmacist in a community pharmacy. I can still remember the dispensing regulations being officially amended to allow pharmacists to decline to dispense oral contraceptives on moral or religious grounds provided they pointed the patient to a pharmacy that would supply. The letter made me consider a question to which I do not know the answer, namely, do GPs have similar rights? Another question is, can an employer refuse to employ a pharmacist who refuses to dispense "the pill"?
机译:我的老朋友Brian Curwain的来信(2013年4月6日,PJ,p372)使我思考一些药剂师所面临的道德和道德困境,尤其是当一个人在社区药房担任唯一药剂师时。我仍然记得,官方对分配条例进行了修改,允许药剂师基于道德或宗教理由拒绝分配口服避孕药,只要他们将患者指向可以提供的药房即可。这封信使我考虑了一个我不知道答案的问题,即全科医生有类似的权利吗?另一个问题是,雇主可以拒绝雇用拒绝分配“药丸”的药剂师吗?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号