首页> 外文期刊>The pharmaceutical journal >An invidious distinction?
【24h】

An invidious distinction?

机译:有区别吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the run up to the launch of a new professional body,I understand that making it attractive to possible members is important.But there is a nasty taste left by comments from the chief executive Jeremy Holmes.Leading the latest issue of Your Society(December 2008),he states:"Membership of the new body will stand for something very important to all stakeholders-quality.The designatory letters(so-called"post-nominals")which will result from membership(not from registration with the General Pharmaceutical Council)will be a key signal of an individuals commitment to that quality."Mr Holmes has previously made comments of similar tone elsewhere in the pharmacy press.
机译:在启动新的专业机构的过程中,我了解使之吸引可能的成员很重要。但是,首席执行官杰里米·霍姆斯(Jeremy Holmes)的评论留下了令人讨厌的味道。 2008年),他指出:“新机构的成员身份代表着对所有利益相关者的质量非常重要的事情。代号(所谓的“名义后”)将由成员资格产生(而不是由通用制药注册)理事会将是个人对这种质量承诺的关键信号。”福尔摩斯先生此前曾在药店的其他地方发表过类似的评论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号