...
首页> 外文期刊>The pharmaceutical journal >CCA criticises lack of transparency in fees rationale
【24h】

CCA criticises lack of transparency in fees rationale

机译:CCA批评收费理由缺乏透明度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Company Chemists'Association believes that the Royal Pharmaceutical Society's powers to increase pharmacist retention fees should come with a "responsibility to act reasonably and proportionately".In its response to the Society's consultation on the matter,the CCA also says that the Society needs to "provide more information about how it intends the fee increase to be used so that its members,and other bodies who may reimburse members' personal retention fees,see how the calculated increase has been derived".Consistent with this,transparency is a recurring theme in the CCA response:"The CCA accepts that the Council has a duty to act in the best interests of the Society,and that some parts of the budget,especially those that concern the RPSGB's commercial activities,must remain confidential,but it considers the level of detail provided to support the fee increases proposed remains inadequate."
机译:Company Chemists'Association认为,Royal Pharmaceutical Society会提高药剂师保留费的权力应带有“负责合理和按比例行事”的责任。 “提供更多有关如何打算使用费用增加的信息,以便其成员以及其他可能偿还成员的个人保留费用的机构,了解如何计算出增加的费用。”与此相符,透明度是一个经常出现的主题在CCA回应中:“ CCA接受理事会有责任为协会的最大利益而行动,并且预算的某些部分,尤其是那些涉及RPSGB商业活动的部分,必须保持机密,但它认为为支持拟议的费用增加而提供的细节水平仍然不足。”

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号