首页> 外文期刊>The pharmaceutical journal >The debate should move on
【24h】

The debate should move on

机译:辩论应继续进行

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The debate over whether or not proof is required for homoeopathy has been raised once more.I must say that I do not believe that homoeopathy has a sound scientific basis but I also accept that this has never been a barrier to people wanting to use it.Far from it;it is,in fact,the very "anti-science" that makes it appealing to some.The lack of credible evidence is understandable when the basis of therapy is individually tailored and is not easily analysed by large population studies.
机译:关于是否需要顺势疗法的证据再次引发了争论。我必须说,我不认为顺势疗法具有良好的科学基础,但我也接受这从未成为人们想要使用顺势疗法的障碍。远非如此;实际上,正是它的“反科学”使它吸引了一些人。当疗法的基础是个体定制的且难以通过大量人群研究进行分析时,缺乏可靠的证据是可以理解的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号