...
首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Factors affecting outcomes in patients reaching end-stage kidney disease worldwide: differences in access to renal replacement therapy, modality use, and haemodialysis practices
【24h】

Factors affecting outcomes in patients reaching end-stage kidney disease worldwide: differences in access to renal replacement therapy, modality use, and haemodialysis practices

机译:全球影响终末期肾脏疾病患者结局的因素:肾脏替代疗法,使用方式和血液透析方法的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

More than 2 million people worldwide are being treated for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). This Series paper provides an overview of incidence, modality use (in-centre haemodialysis, home dialysis, or transplantation), and mortality for patients with ESKD based on national registry data. We also present data from an international cohort study to highlight differences in haemodialysis practices that affect survival and the experience of patients who rely on this therapy, which is both life-sustaining and profoundly disruptive to their quality of life. Data illustrate disparities in access to renal replacement therapy of any kind and in the use of transplantation or home dialysis, both of which are widely considered preferable to in-centre haemodialysis for many patients with ESKD in settings where infrastructure permits. For most patients with ESKD worldwide who are treated with in-centre haemodialysis, overall survival is poor, but longer in some Asian countries than elsewhere in the world, and longer in Europe than in the USA, although this gap has reduced. Commendable haemodialysis practice includes exceptionally high use of surgical vascular access in Japan and in some European countries, and the use of longer or more frequent dialysis sessions in some countries, allowing for more effective volume management. Mortality is especially high soon after ESKD onset, and improved preparation for ESKD is needed including alignment of decision making with the wishes of patients and families.
机译:全球有超过200万人正接受晚期肾病(ESKD)的治疗。本系列论文根据国家注册数据,概述了ESKD患者的发病率,使用方式(中心血液透析,家庭透析或移植)和死亡率。我们还提供了一项来自国际队列研究的数据,以突出血液透析方法的差异,这些差异会影响患者的生存率和依赖该疗法的患者的体验,这既可以维持生命,又会严重破坏他们的生活质量。数据表明在使用任何形式的肾脏替代疗法以及使用移植或家庭透析方面存在差异,对于基础设施允许的许多ESKD患者,这两种方法被普遍认为比中心血液透析更可取。对于世界范围内大多数接受中心血液透析治疗的ESKD患者,总体生存率较差,但在某些亚洲国家中,其生存期长于世界其他地区,而在欧洲,其生存期长于美国,尽管这一差距已缩小。值得称赞的血液透析做法包括在日本和某些欧洲国家中大量使用外科手术血管,在某些国家中使用更长或更频繁的透析过程,以实现更有效的容量管理。在ESKD发作后不久,死亡率特别高,需要改进ESKD的准备工作,包括使决策与患者和家人的意愿保持一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号