...
首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (IABP-SHOCK II): Fi nal 12 month results of a randomised, open-label trial
【24h】

Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (IABP-SHOCK II): Fi nal 12 month results of a randomised, open-label trial

机译:急性心肌梗死并发心源性休克(IABP-SHOCK II)的主动脉内球囊反搏:一项随机,开放标签试验的最后12个月结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background In current international guidelines the recommendation for intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) use has been downgraded in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction on the basis of registry data. In the largest randomised trial (IABP-SHOCK II), IABP support did not reduce 30 day mortality compared with control. However, previous trials in cardiogenic shock showed a mortality benefi t only at extended follow-up. The present analysis therefore reports 6 and 12 month results. Methods The IABP-SHOCK II trial was a randomised, open-label, multicentre trial. Patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction who were undergoing early revascularisation and optimum medical therapy were randomly assigned (1:1) to IABP versus control via a central web-based system. The primary effi cacy endpoint was 30 day all-cause mortality, but 6 and 12 month follow-up was done in addition to quality-of-life assessment for all survivors with the Euroqol-5D questionnaire. A masked central committee adjudicated clinical outcomes. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00491036. Findings Between June 16, 2009, and March 3, 2012, 600 patients were assigned to IABP (n=301) or control (n=299). Of 595 patients completing 12 month follow-up, 155 (52%) of 299 patients in the IABP group and 152 (51%) of 296 patients in the control group had died (relative risk [RR] 1·01, 95% CI 0·86-1·18, p=0·91). There were no signifi cant diff erences in reinfarction (RR 2·60, 95% CI 0·95-7·10, p=0·05), recurrent revascularisation (0·91, 0·58- 1·41, p=0·77), or stroke (1·50, 0·25-8·84, p=1·00). For survivors, quality-of-life measures including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression did not diff er signifi cantly between study groups. Interpretation In patients undergoing early revas cularisation for myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock, IABP did not reduce 12 month all-cause mortality. Funding German Research Foundation; German Heart Research Foundation; German Cardiac Society; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhaus?rzte; University of Leipzig-Heart Centre; Maquet Cardiopulmonary; Teleflex Medical.
机译:背景技术在当前的国际指南中,根据注册表数据,在导致并发急性心肌梗塞的心源性休克中降低了使用主动脉内球囊泵(IABP)的建议。在最大的随机试验(IABP-SHOCK II)中,与对照组相比,IABP支持并未降低30天死亡率。但是,以前的心源性休克试验显示,只有延长随访时间,才能带来更高的死亡率。因此,本分析报告了6个月和12个月的结果。方法IABP-SHOCK II试验是一项随机,开放标签,多中心试验。经历早期血运重建和最佳药物治疗的患有心源性休克并发急性心肌梗死的患者通过基于中央网络的系统被随机分配(1:1)进行IABP与对照。主要疗效终点是30天全因死亡率,但是除了采用Euroqol-5D问卷对所有幸存者进行生活质量评估外,还进行了6个月和12个月的随访。蒙面的中央委员会裁定临床结果。患者和研究者并未隐瞒治疗分配。分析是按意向进行的。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,NCT00491036。研究结果在2009年6月16日至2012年3月3日之间,有600名患者被分配到IABP(n = 301)或对照组(n = 299)。在完成12个月随访的595名患者中,IABP组的299名患者中有155名(52%),对照组的296名患者中有152名(51%)死亡(相对危险度[RR] 1·01,95%CI 0·86-1·18,p = 0·91)。再梗死(RR 2·60,95%CI 0·95-7·10,p = 0·05),复发性血运重建(0·91、0·58-1·41,p = 0·77)或笔画(1·50,0·25-8·84,p = 1·00)。对于幸存者而言,生活质量衡量标准(包括活动能力,自我护理,日常活动,疼痛或不适以及焦虑或抑郁)在研究组之间没有显着差异。解释对于因心肌梗塞并发心源性休克而进行早期抢断术的患者,IABP并未降低12个月的全因死亡率。资助德国研究基金会;德国心脏研究基金会;德国心脏学会; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhaus?rzte;莱比锡大学心脏中心;马凯心肺; Teleflex Medical。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号