...
首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Effect of donor age and cold storage time on outcome in recipients of kidneys donated after circulatory death in the UK: a cohort study
【24h】

Effect of donor age and cold storage time on outcome in recipients of kidneys donated after circulatory death in the UK: a cohort study

机译:一项队列研究:供体年龄和冷藏时间对英国循环死亡后捐献的肾脏接受者结局的影响:一项队列研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background Use of kidneys donated after controlled circulatory death has increased the number of transplants undertaken in the UK but there remains reluctance to use kidneys from older circulatory-death donors and concern that kidneys from circulatory-death donors are particularly susceptible to cold ischaemic injury. We aimed to compare the effect of donor age and cold ischaemic time on transplant outcome in kidneys donated after circulatory death versus brain death. Methods We used the UK transplant registry to select a cohort of first-time recipients (aged >18 years) of deceased-donor kidneys for transplantations done between Jan 1, 2005, and Nov 1, 2010. We did univariate comparisons of transplants from brain-death donors versus circulatory-death donors with chi~2 tests for categorical data and Wilcoxon tests for non-parametric continuous data. We used Kaplan-Meier curves to show graft survival. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to adjust for donor and recipient factors associated with graft-survival with tests for interaction effects to establish the relative effect of donor age and cold ischaemia on kidneys from circulatory-death and brain-death donors. Findings 6490 deceased-donor kidney transplants were done at 23 centres. 3 year graft survival showed no difference between circulatory-death (n=1768) and brain-death (n=4127) groups (HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.95-1.36, p=0.16). Donor age older than 60 years (compared with <40 years) was associated with an increased risk of graft loss for all deceased-donor kidneys (2.35,1 . 85-3. 00, p<0. 0001) but there was no increased risk of graft loss for circulatory-death donors older than 60 years compared with brain-death donors in the same age group (p=0.30). Prolonged cold ischaemic time (>24 h vs <12 h) was not associated with decreased graft survival for all deceased-donor kidneys but was associated with poorer graft survival for kidneys from circulatory-death donors than for those from brain-death donors (2 ? 36, 1. 39-4.02, p for interaction= . 004). Interpretation Kidneys from older circulatory-death donors have equivalent graft survival to kidneys from brain-death donors in the same age group, and are acceptable for transplantation. However, circulatory-death donor kidneys tolerate cold storage less well than do brain-death donor kidneys and this finding should be considered when developing organ allocation policy.
机译:背景技术在控制性循环死亡后使用捐赠的肾脏增加了英国的移植数量,但仍然不愿使用较老的循环死亡供体的肾脏,并担心循环死亡供体的肾脏特别容易受到寒冷缺血的伤害。我们旨在比较供体年龄和寒冷缺血时间对循环死亡与脑死亡后捐赠肾脏的移植结局的影响。方法我们使用UK移植注册中心选择了一组2005年1月1日至2010年11月1日期间首次接受死者肾脏移植的患者(年龄大于18岁)。我们对来自大脑的移植物进行了单变量比较。死亡捐献者与循环死亡捐献者的分类数据采用chi〜2检验,非参数连续数据采用Wilcoxon检验。我们使用Kaplan-Meier曲线来显示移植物存活率。我们使用Cox比例风险回归来调整与移植物存活相关的供体和受体因素,并通过交互作用测试来确定供体年龄和冷缺血对循环死亡和脑死亡供体肾脏的相对影响。在23个中心进行了6490例死者肾脏移植。循环死亡(n = 1768)和脑死亡(n = 4127)组之间的3年移植物存活率无差异(HR 1.14,95%CI 0.95-1.36,p = 0.16)。供体年龄大于60岁(<40岁)与所有已死亡供体肾脏的移植物丢失风险增加相关(2.35,1。85-3。00,p <0。0001),但没有增加与同年龄组的脑死亡供者相比,年龄大于60岁的循环死亡供者的移植物丢失风险较高(p = 0.30)。延长的冷缺血时间(> 24 h vs <12 h)与所有死者供肾的移植物存活率降低无关,但与循环死亡供体的肾脏移植物存活率相比脑死亡供体的肾脏移植物存活率差(2) 36,1。39-4.02,交互作用的p = 0.004)。解释来自相同年龄组的较老的循环死亡供体的肾脏具有与来自脑死亡供体的肾脏相同的移植物存活率,并且可以接受移植。然而,循环死亡供体肾脏对冷藏的耐受性不如脑死亡供体肾脏,因此在制定器官分配政策时应考虑这一发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号