...
首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation: A randomised controlled trial
【24h】

Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation: A randomised controlled trial

机译:电子烟戒烟:一项随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) can deliver nicotine and mitigate tobacco withdrawal and are used by many smokers to assist quit attempts. We investigated whether e-cigarettes are more eff ective than nicotine patches at helping smokers to quit. Methods We did this pragmatic randomised-controlled superiority trial in Auckland, New Zealand, between Sept 6, 2011, and July 5, 2013. Adult (≥18 years) smokers wanting to quit were randomised (with computerised block randomisation, block size nine, stratifi ed by ethnicity [Māori; Pacifi c; or non-Māori, non-Pacifi c], sex [men or women], and level of nicotine dependence [>5 or ≤5 Fagerstr?m test for nicotine dependence]) in a 4:4:1 ratio to 16 mg nicotine e-cigarettes, nicotine patches (21 mg patch, one daily), or placebo e-cigarettes (no nicotine), from 1 week before until 12 weeks after quit day, with low intensity behavioural support via voluntary telephone counselling. The primary outcome was biochemically verifi ed continuous abstinence at 6 months (exhaled breath carbon monoxide measurement <10 ppm). Primary analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, number ACTRN12610000866000. Findings 657 people were randomised (289 to nicotine e-cigarettes, 295 to patches, and 73 to placebo e-cigarettes) and were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. At 6 months, verifi ed abstinence was 7·3% (21 of 289) with nicotine e-cigarettes, 5·8% (17 of 295) with patches, and 4·1% (three of 73) with placebo e-cigarettes (risk diff erence for nicotine e-cigarette vs patches 1·51 [95% CI-2·49 to 5·51]; for nicotine e-cigarettes vs placebo e-cigarettes 3·16 [95% CI-2·29 to 8·61]). Achievement of abstinence was substantially lower than we anticipated for the power calculation, thus we had insuffi cient statistical power to conclude superiority of nicotine e-cigarettes to patches or to placebo e-cigarettes. We identifi ed no signifi cant diff erences in adverse events, with 137 events in the nicotine e-cigarettes group, 119 events in the patches group, and 36 events in the placebo e-cigarettes group. We noted no evidence of an association between adverse events and study product. Interpretation E-cigarettes, with or without nicotine, were modestly eff ective at helping smokers to quit, with similar achievement of abstinence as with nicotine patches, and few adverse events. Uncertainty exists about the place of e-cigarettes in tobacco control, and more research is urgently needed to clearly establish their overall benefi ts and harms at both individual and population levels. Funding Health Research Council of New Zealand.
机译:背景技术电子烟(电子烟)可以传递尼古丁并减轻烟草的戒断,并且被许多吸烟者用来协助戒烟。我们调查了电子烟在帮助吸烟者戒烟方面是否比尼古丁贴片更有效。方法我们在2011年9月6日至2013年7月5日之间在新西兰奥克兰进行了一项务实的随机对照优势试验。将希望戒烟的成年(≥18岁)吸烟者进行随机分组(计算机分组随机分组,分组大小为9,根据种族[毛利人,太平洋人或非毛利人,非太平洋人],性别[男人或女人]和尼古丁依赖程度[> 5或≤5Fagerstr?m尼古丁依赖程度]进行分层从戒烟日前1周到戒烟后12周,与16 mg尼古丁电子烟,尼古丁贴片(21 mg贴剂,每天1次)或安慰剂电子烟(无尼古丁)的比例为4:4:1,行为强度低通过自愿电话咨询提供支持。主要结果是在6个月内通过生化检查证实持续戒酒(呼出气中一氧化碳测量值<10 ppm)。初步分析是按意向进行的。该试验已在澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心注册,编号为ACTRN12610000866000。发现657人被随机分组​​(尼古丁电子烟289人,贴片295人,安慰剂电子烟73人),并纳入意向性治疗分析。在6个月时,尼古丁电子烟的验证戒酒率为7·3%(289个中的21个),贴剂为5·8%(295个中的17个),安慰剂电子烟为4·1%(73个中的3个) (尼古丁电子烟与贴剂1·51 [95%CI-2·49至5·51]的风险差异;尼古丁电子烟与安慰剂电子烟3·16 [95%CI-2·29至8·61])。禁欲的实现大大低于我们对功效计算的预期,因此我们没有足够的统计能力来得出尼古丁电子烟对贴剂或安慰剂电子烟的优越性。我们未发现不良事件有显着差异,尼古丁电子烟组为137个事件,贴剂组为119个事件,安慰剂电子烟组为36个事件。我们没有发现不良事件与研究产品之间存在关联的证据。具有或不具有尼古丁的解释性电子烟在帮助吸烟者戒烟方面具有适度的效果,与尼古丁贴片的戒烟效果相似,不良事件极少。关于电子烟在烟草控制中的位置存在不确定性,因此迫切需要开展更多研究以明确确定其在个人和人口层面的总体利益和危害。新西兰资助健康研究委员会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号