首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-labelf randomised controlled trial
【24h】

Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-labelf randomised controlled trial

机译:Foley导管与阴道前列腺素E2凝胶在足月引产(PROBAAT试验):一项开放标签f随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Induction of labour is a common obstetric procedure. Both mechanical (eg, Foley catheters) and pharmacological methods (eg, prostaglandins) are used for induction of labour in women with an unfavourable cervix. We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safely of induction of labour with a Foley catheter with induction with vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel. Methods We did an open-label, randomised controlled trial in 12 hospitals in the Netherlands between Feb 10, 2009, and May 17, 2010. We enrolled women with a term singleton pregnancy in cephalic presentation, intact membranes, an unfavourable cervix, an indication for induction of labour, and no prior caesarean section. Participants were randomly allocated by an online randomisation system to induction of labour with a 30 mL Foley catheter or vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel (1:1 ratio). Because of the nature of the intervention this study was not blinded. The primary outcome was caesarean section rate. Secondary outcomes were maternal and neonatal morbidity and time from intervention to birth. All analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis. We also did a meta-analysis that included our trial. The trial was registered with the Dutch trial registry, number NTR1646. Findings 824 women were allocated to induction of labour with a Foley catheter (n=412) or vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel (n=412). Caesarean section rates were much the same between the two groups (23% vs 20%, risk ratio [RR] 1-13, 95% CI 0 ? 87-1 ? 47). A meta-analysis including our trial data confirmed that a Foley catheter did not reduce caesarean section rates. We recorded two serious maternal adverse events, both in the prostaglandin group: one uterine perforation and one uterine rupture. Interpretation In women with an unfavourable cervix at term, induction of labour with a Foley catheter is similar to induction of labour with prostaglandin E2 gel, with fewer maternal and neonatal side-effects.
机译:背景技术引产是常见的产科程序。机械的(例如,Foley导管)和药理学的方法(例如,前列腺素)均用于宫颈不良的妇女引产。我们旨在比较用Foley导管和阴道前列腺素E2凝胶诱导引产的有效性和安全性。方法我们于2009年2月10日至2010年5月17日在荷兰的12家医院进行了一项开放标签,随机对照试验。我们纳入了单胎妊娠,头颅膜完整,宫颈不良,适应症为足月妊娠的妇女。用于引产,并且无需事先剖腹产。通过在线随机系统将参与者随机分配到使用30 mL Foley导管或阴道前列腺素E2凝胶(1:1比例)引产。由于干预的性质,本研究没有盲目性。主要结局是剖腹产率。次要结局为母婴发病率以及从干预到分娩的时间。所有分析均按意向性进行。我们还进行了包括我们的试验在内的荟萃分析。该试验已在荷兰试验注册中心注册,编号为NTR1646。研究结果824名妇女被分配使用Foley导管(n = 412)或阴道前列腺素E2凝胶(n = 412)引产。两组的剖腹产率几乎相同(23%vs 20%,风险比[RR] 1-13,95%CI 0?87-1?47)。包含我们的试验数据的荟萃分析证实,Foley导管不会降低剖腹产率。我们在前列腺素组中记录了两个严重的母体不良事件:一个子宫穿孔和一个子宫破裂。解释对于足月宫颈不良的妇女,用Foley导管引产类似于使用前列腺素E2凝胶引产,对母婴的影响较小。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号