...
首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007-08.
【24h】

Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007-08.

机译:亚洲分娩和妊娠结局的方法:世界卫生组织2007-08年全球孕产妇和围产期健康调查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: There has been concern about rising rates of caesarean section worldwide. This Article reports the third phase of the WHO global survey, which aimed to estimate the rate of different methods of delivery and to examine the relation between method of delivery and maternal and perinatal outcomes in selected facilities in Africa and Latin America in 2004-05, and in Asia in 2007-08. METHODS: Nine countries participated in the Asia global survey: Cambodia, China, India, Japan, Nepal, Philippines, Sri Lanka, Thailand, and Vietnam. In each country, the capital city and two other regions or provinces were randomly selected. We studied all women admitted for delivery during 3 months in institutions with 6000 or fewer expected deliveries per year and during 2 months in those with more than 6000 deliveries. We gathered data for institutions to obtain a detailed description of the health facility and its resources for obstetric care. We obtained data from women's medical records to summarise obstetric and perinatal events. FINDINGS: We obtained data for 109 101 of 112 152 deliveries reported in 122 recruited facilities (97% coverage), and analysed 107 950 deliveries. The overall rate of caesarean section was 27.3% (n=29 428) and of operative vaginal delivery was 3.2% (n=3465). Risk of maternal mortality and morbidity index (at least one of: maternal mortality, admission to intensive care unit [ICU], blood transfusion, hysterectomy, or internal iliac artery ligation) was increased for operative vaginal delivery (adjusted odds ratio 2.1, 95% CI 1.7-2.6) and all types of caesarean section (antepartum without indication 2.7, 1.4-5.5; antepartum with indication 10.6, 9.3-12.0; intrapartum without indication 14.2, 9.8-20.7; intrapartum with indication 14.5, 13.2-16.0). For breech presentation, caesarean section, either antepartum (0.2, 0.1-0.3) or intrapartum (0.3, 0.2-0.4), was associated with improved perinatal outcomes, but also with increased risk of stay in neonatal ICU (2.0, 1.1-3.6; and 2.1, 1.2-3.7, respectively). INTERPRETATION: To improve maternal and perinatal outcomes, caesarean section should be done only when there is a medical indication. FUNDING: US Agency for International Development (USAID); UNDP/UNFPA/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), WHO, Switzerland; Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan; Ministry of Public Health, China; and Indian Council of Medical Research.
机译:背景:人们一直关注着全球剖腹产率的上升。本条报告了WHO的全球调查的第三阶段,该阶段的目的是估计2004-05年度非洲和拉丁美洲部分设施中不同分娩方法的比率,并检查分娩方法与母婴围产期结局之间的关系,并于2007-08年在亚洲发布。方法:九个国家参加了亚洲全球调查:柬埔寨,中国,印度,日本,尼泊尔,菲律宾,斯里兰卡,泰国和越南。在每个国家,都随机选择了首都和另外两个地区或省。我们研究了在每年预期分娩次数少于或少于6000次的机构中接受分娩的3个月内所有妇女,以及对于分娩次数超过6000次的机构接受2个月内分娩的妇女。我们收集了机构的数据,以获得对医疗机构及其产科护理资源的详细说明。我们从妇女的病历中获得了数据,以总结产科和围产期事件。结果:我们获得了122个招募设施中报告的112152例交付中的109101例数据(覆盖率97%),并分析了107950例交付量。剖宫产总率为27.3%(n = 29 428),手术阴道分娩的总率为3.2%(n = 3465)。手术阴道分娩的产妇死亡率和发病率指数(产妇死亡率,重症监护病房(ICU)入院,输血,子宫切除术或内动脉结扎中的至少一项)的风险增加(经调整的优势比为2.1、95%) CI 1.7-2.6)和所有类型的剖腹产(产前无指征2.7,1.4-5.5;产前无指征10.6,9.3-12.0;产前无指征14.2,9.8-20.7;产前有指征14.5,13.2-16.0)。对于臀位表现,剖腹产,无论是产前(0.2,0.1-0.3)还是产后(0.3,0.2-0.4),均与围产期结局改善相关,但与留在新生儿ICU的风险增加有关(2.0,1.1-3.6;和2.1、1.2-3.7)。解释:为改善母体和围产期结局,仅在有医学适应症时才应进行剖腹产。资金:美国国际开发署(USAID);开发计划署/人口基金/卫生组织/世界银行人类生殖研究,发展和研究培训特别方案,卫生组织,瑞士;日本厚生劳动省;中国公共卫生部;和印度医学研究理事会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号