首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >Re: Blunt versus bladed Trocars in laparoscopic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
【24h】

Re: Blunt versus bladed Trocars in laparoscopic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

机译:回复:腹腔镜手术中钝性还是带刀片的套管针:随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Editorial Comment: The authors analyzed 8 randomized studies that enrolled 720 patients, and compared trocar associated complications with the use of blunt and bladed trocars. The primary outcome measure was risk of abdominal wall trocar site bleeding, and secondary outcomes were risk of vascular or visceral injuries and overall trocar related morbidity._ As expected, the risk of abdominal wall bleeding was threefold greater with bladed trocars (9% vs 3%) and the risk of complications excluding abdominal wall bleeding was also greater (0.7% vs 0.2%), although complications were rare. Use of blunt or dilating trocars for robotic and laparoscopic surgery should be standard.
机译:社论评论:作者分析了8项随机研究,招募了720名患者,并将套管针相关并发症与钝性和刀片式套管针的使用进行了比较。主要结局指标为腹壁套管针部位出血风险,次要结局为血管或内脏损伤风险以及与套管针总体发病率有关。_正如预期的那样,带刀片套管针的腹壁出血风险高三倍(9%vs 3)。 %),并且并发症发生的风险也较高(0.7%vs 0.2%),尽管并发症很少见。使用钝性或扩张性套管针进行机器人和腹腔镜手术应成为标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号