首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >Early removal of urethral catheter with suprapubic tube drainage versus urethral catheter drainage alone after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
【24h】

Early removal of urethral catheter with suprapubic tube drainage versus urethral catheter drainage alone after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

机译:机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治性切除术后早期耻骨上引流术与单独行导尿管引流术的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose Retrospective single institution data suggest that postoperative pain after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is decreased by early removal of the urethral catheter with suprapubic tube drainage. In a randomized patient population we determined whether suprapubic tube drainage with early urethral catheter removal would improve postoperative pain compared with urethral catheter drainage alone. Materials and Methods Men with a body mass index of less than 40 kg/m2 who had newly diagnosed prostate cancer and elected robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy were included in analysis. Block randomization by surgeon was used and randomization assignment was done after completing the urethrovesical anastomosis. In patients assigned to suprapubic tube drainage the urethral catheter was removed on postoperative day 1 and all catheters were removed on postoperative day 7. Visual analog pain scale and satisfaction questionnaires were administered on postoperative days 0, 1 and 7. Results A total of 29 patients were randomized to the urethral catheter vs 29 to the suprapubic tube plus early urethral catheter removal at the time of interim futility analysis. Mean visual analog pain scale scores did not differ between the groups at any time point and a similar percent of patients cited the catheter as the greatest bother with nonsignificant differences in treatment related satisfaction. Complications during postoperative week 1 did not vary between the groups. Based on interim results the trial was terminated due to lack of effect. Conclusions Patients randomized to suprapubic tube vs urethral catheter drainage for the week after prostatectomy had similar pain, catheter related bother and treatment related satisfaction in the perioperative period. We no longer routinely offer suprapubic tube drainage with early urethral catheter removal at our institution.
机译:目的回顾性单一机构数据表明,通过耻骨上导管引流的早期拔除尿道导管,可以减少机器人辅助的腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后的术后疼痛。在随机分组的患者中,我们确定了与单纯尿道导管引流相比,耻骨上耻骨上引流和早期尿道导管拔除是否可以改善术后疼痛。材料和方法分析的对象包括体重指数小于40 kg / m2的男性,刚诊断出前列腺癌并选择机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的男性。使用外科医生进行的区组随机化,并在完成尿道静脉吻合术后进行随机分配。在分配给耻骨上管引流的患者中,在术后第1天取下尿道导管,并在术后第7天取下所有导管。在术后第0、1和7天进行视觉模拟疼痛量表和满意度问卷调查。结果共有29例患者临时无效分析时,将其随机分配至尿道导管,而将29根随机分配至耻骨上管+早期取出尿道导管。两组之间在任何时间点的平均视觉模拟疼痛量表评分均无差异,相似的患者百分比认为导管是最大的困扰,治疗相关满意度无明显差异。术后第一周的并发症在两组之间没有差异。根据中期结果,该试验由于无效而终止。结论在前列腺切除术后的一周内,随机分配至耻骨上导管和尿道导管引流的患者在围手术期疼痛,导管相关的困扰和治疗相关的满意度相似。在我们机构中,我们不再常规行耻骨上引流术并需要早期拔除尿道导管。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号