首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >Impact of a common clinical pathway on length of hospital stay in patients undergoing open and minimally invasive kidney surgery
【24h】

Impact of a common clinical pathway on length of hospital stay in patients undergoing open and minimally invasive kidney surgery

机译:常见的临床途径对接受开放式微创肾脏手术的患者住院时间的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose Clinical pathways are designed to reduce variability in patient care practices and improve clinical outcomes. We evaluated the effect of implementing a clinical care pathway on length of stay in patients undergoing kidney surgery. Materials and Methods After receiving institutional review board approval we evaluated prospective data on consecutive cases of partial and radical nephrectomy performed at our institution from 2000 to 2011. We identified 1,775 partial nephrectomies (1,449 open and 326 minimally invasive) and 1,025 radical nephrectomies (857 open and 168 minimally invasive). We used multivariate linear regression to test for an interaction between procedure type and surgery before vs after the clinical pathway was begun. Results Median length of stay decreased 40% (from 5 to 3 days) for open surgery and 33% (from 3 to 2 days) for minimally invasive surgery after clinical pathway implementation. Length of stay in patients treated with minimally invasive or open partial nephrectomy and open radical nephrectomy decreased while it remained stable in those who underwent minimally invasive radical nephrectomy. The difference in length of stay between open and minimally invasive partial nephrectomy before and after implementing the clinical pathway decreased by 1.5 days (95% CI 0.56-2.5, p = 0.002). At 30 days postoperatively major complication rates remained similar. Conclusions The clinical pathway resulted in a significantly shorter length of stay in patients treated with partial and radical nephrectomy without a discernible impact on safety or quality of care. Clinical pathways for kidney surgery should be used and continually optimized to enhance efficiency, patient safety and outcomes.
机译:目的临床途径旨在减少患者护理实践中的差异并改善临床结果。我们评估了在肾脏手术患者中实施临床护理途径对住院时间的影响。材料和方法在获得机构审查委员会的批准后,我们​​评估了2000年至2011年在本机构进行的部分和根治性肾切除术的连续病例的前瞻性数据。我们确定了1,775例部分性肾切除术(1,449例开放性和326例微创性)和1,025例根治性肾切除术(857例开放和168种微创产品)。我们使用多元线性回归来测试在临床途径开始之前和之后,手术类型和手术之间的相互作用。结果在临床途径实施后,开放手术的中位住院时间减少了40%(从5天到3天),微创手术的住院时间中位数减少了33%(从3天到2天)。在接受微创根治性肾切除术的患者中,接受微创或开放性部分肾切除术和开放性根治性肾切除术的患者的住院时间缩短,而保持稳定。实施临床途径前后,开放式和微创性部分肾切除术之间的住院时间差减少了1.5天(95%CI 0.56-2.5,p = 0.002)。术后30天的主要并发症发生率仍然相似。结论临床途径导致部分和根治性肾切除术患者的住院时间明显缩短,而对安全性或护理质量没有明显影响。应该使用肾脏手术的临床途径,并不断对其进行优化,以提高效率,患者安全性和结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号