首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >Comparison of tissue injury from focused ultrasonic propulsion of kidney stones versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
【24h】

Comparison of tissue injury from focused ultrasonic propulsion of kidney stones versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy

机译:超声聚焦肾结石与体外冲击波碎石术对组织损伤的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: Focused ultrasonic propulsion is a new noninvasive technique designed to move kidney stones and stone fragments out of the urinary collecting system. However, to our knowledge the extent of tissue injury associated with this technique is not known. We quantitated the amount of tissue injury produced by focused ultrasonic propulsion under simulated clinical treatment conditions and under conditions of higher power or continuous duty cycles. We compared those results to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy injury. Materials and Methods: A human calcium oxalate monohydrate stone and/or nickel beads were implanted by ureteroscopy in 3 kidneys of live pigs weighing 45 to 55 kg and repositioned using focused ultrasonic propulsion. Additional pig kidneys were exposed to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy level pulse intensity or continuous ultrasound exposure 10 minutes in duration using an ultrasound probe transcutaneously or on the kidney. These kidneys were compared to 6 treated with an unmodified Dornier HM3 lithotripter (Dornier Medical Systems, Kennesaw, Georgia) using 2,400 shocks at 120 shock waves per minute and 24 kV. Histological analysis was performed to assess the volume of hemorrhagic tissue injury created by each technique according to the percent of functional renal volume. Results: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy produced a mean ± SEM lesion of 1.56% ± 0.45% of functional renal volume. Ultrasonic propulsion produced no detectable lesion with simulated clinical treatment. A lesion of 0.46% ± 0.37% or 1.15% ± 0.49% of functional renal volume was produced when excessive treatment parameters were used with the ultrasound probe placed on the kidney. Conclusions: Focused ultrasonic propulsion produced no detectable morphological injury to the renal parenchyma when using clinical treatment parameters but produced injury comparable in size to that of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy when using excessive treatment parameters.
机译:目的:聚焦超声推进是一种新的非侵入性技术,旨在将肾结石和结石碎片从尿液收集系统中移出。然而,据我们所知,与该技术相关的组织损伤的程度尚不清楚。我们对在模拟的临床治疗条件下以及在较高功率或连续工作周期的条件下,聚焦超声推进所产生的组织损伤进行了定量。我们将这些结果与体外冲击波碎石术进行了比较。材料和方法:通过输尿管镜将人草酸钙一水合物结石和/或镍珠植入三只体重45至55 kg的活猪的肾脏中,并使用聚焦超声推进器重新放置。使用超声探头经皮或在肾脏上,将另外的猪肾脏暴露于体外冲击波碎石术水平的脉冲强度或持续10分钟的持续超声暴露下。将这些肾脏与使用未经修饰的Dornier HM3碎石机(佐治亚州肯尼索的多尼尔医疗系统公司)以每分钟120次冲击波和24 kV的2400次冲击治疗的6只肾脏进行比较。进行组织学分析,以根据功能性肾体积的百分比评估每种技术产生的出血性组织损伤的体积。结果:体外冲击波碎石术产生的平均±SEM病变为功能性肾体积的1.56%±0.45%。用模拟的临床治疗方法,超声波推进未产生可检测的病变。当超声探头放置在肾脏上使用过多的治疗参数时,会产生功能性肾脏体积的0.46%±0.37%或1.15%±0.49%的病变。结论:在使用临床治疗参数时,聚焦超声推进对肾实质没有可检测到的形态学损伤,但是在使用过多治疗参数时,所产生的损伤与体外冲击波碎石术相当。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号