首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >The impact of an antibiotic coating on the artificial urinary sphincter infection rate
【24h】

The impact of an antibiotic coating on the artificial urinary sphincter infection rate

机译:抗生素涂层对人工尿道括约肌感染率的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose: In April 2008 InhibiZone? antibiotic coated artificial urinary sphincters were introduced. The antibiotic coating significantly increased the cost of the device by an average of $1,300 per artificial urinary sphincter. To our knowledge, no clinical data to date support the theory that this antibiotic coating decreases the risk of artificial urinary sphincter infection. Therefore, we compared infection rates in our cases before and after the introduction of InhibiZone coated artificial urinary sphincters to determine whether the coating decreased the device infection rate. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 426 consecutive patients in whom an artificial urinary sphincter was implanted by a single surgeon from January 2005 to June 2012. Patients were divided equally into 213 consecutive males who received an artificial urinary sphincter without the antibiotic coating from January 2005 to March 2008 and 213 consecutive males implanted with the antibiotic coated artificial urinary sphincter from April 2008 to June 2012. Demographics and infection rates were compared. Results: Patient mean age, associated comorbidities and complexity were almost identical in the groups with and without the antibiotic coating, and infection rates were identical at 7 patients (3.3%) per group (p = 0.99). In the more complex patient subgroup with revision the antibiotic coating did not impact the infection rate. Infection developed in 2 of 50 patients (5%) with the antibiotic coated device and in 3 of 38 (6%) with the uncoated device (p = 0.42). Conclusions: The InhibiZone coating of the artificial urinary sphincters did not alter the infection rate in our study. The added cost of the antibiotic coated artificial urinary sphincters (total of approximately $276,000 more for all 213 coated devices) was of no benefit in our series. Based on this assessment, we will transition to using artificial urinary sphincters without InhibiZone in our practice.
机译:目的:2008年4月InhibiZone?介绍了涂有抗生素的人工尿道括约肌。抗生素涂层显着增加了该装置的成本,每个人工尿道括约肌平均增加了1300美元。据我们所知,迄今为止尚无临床数据支持这种抗生素涂层可降低人工尿道括约肌感染风险的理论。因此,我们比较了在采用InhibiZone涂层人工尿道括约肌之前和之后的感染率,以确定涂层是否降低了设备的感染率。材料和方法:我们回顾性分析了2005年1月至2012年6月由单名外科医生植入了426例连续性人工尿道括约肌的患者的记录。将患者平均分为213例连续的男性,他们接受了无抗生素涂层的人工尿道括约肌。从2005年1月到2008年3月,从2008年4月到2012年6月,连续213例男性植入了带抗生素涂层的人工尿道括约肌。比较了人口统计学和感染率。结果:在有和没有抗生素涂层的组中,患者的平均年龄,相关合并症和复杂性几乎相同,每组中有7名患者(3.3%)的感染率相同(p = 0.99)。在较复杂的患者亚组中,抗生素涂层不会影响感染率。 50例患者中有2人(5%)感染了抗生素,但未涂膜的患者中有3例(6%)(p = 0.42)。结论:在我们的研究中,人工尿道括约肌的InhibiZone涂层没有改变感染率。涂有抗生素的人工尿道括约肌的增加成本(所有213种涂膜装置的总费用合计约276,000美元)在我们的系列中没有好处。基于此评估,我们将在实践中过渡到使用不带InhibiZone的人工尿道括约肌。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号