首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >A comparison of models for predicting sperm retrieval before microdissection testicular sperm extraction in men with nonobstructive azoospermia
【24h】

A comparison of models for predicting sperm retrieval before microdissection testicular sperm extraction in men with nonobstructive azoospermia

机译:非阻塞性无精症男性显微解剖睾丸精子提取前预测精子恢复模型的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose: We developed an artificial neural network and nomogram using readily available clinical features to model the chance of identifying sperm with microdissection testicular sperm extraction by readily available preoperative clinical parameters for men with nonobstructive azoospermia. Materials and Methods: We reviewed the records of 1,026 men who underwent microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Patient age, follicle-stimulating hormone level, testicular volume, history of cryptorchidism, Klinefelter syndrome and presence of varicocele were included in the models. For the artificial neural network the data set was divided randomly into a training set (75%) and a test set (25%) with n12 cross validation used to evaluate model accuracy, and then modeled with a neural computational system. In addition, a nomogram with calibration plots was developed to predict sperm retrieval with microdissection testicular sperm extraction. We compared these models to logistic regression. Results: The ROC area for the neural computational system in the test set was 0.641. The neural network correctly predicted the outcome in 152 of the 256 test set patients (59.4%). The nomogram AUC was 0.59 and adequately calibrated. Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated patient age, history of Klinefelter syndrome and cryptorchidism to be significant predictors of sperm retrieval (p <0.05). However, follicle-stimulating hormone and testicular volume were not significant by internal validation. Conclusions: We modeled a combination of well described preoperative clinical parameters to predict sperm retrieval using a neural computational system and nomogram with acceptable predictive values. The generalizability of these findings requires external validation. ? 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.
机译:目的:我们利用现成的临床特征开发了一个人工神经网络和列线图,以通过无障碍无精子症患者的现成术前临床参数,通过显微解剖睾丸精子提取来鉴定精子的机会。材料和方法:我们回顾了1026名行显微解剖睾丸精子提取术的男性的记录。模型中包括患者年龄,促卵泡激素水平,睾丸体积,隐睾病史,克莱氏综合征和精索静脉曲张的存在。对于人工神经网络,将数据集随机分为训练集(75%)和测试集(25%),并使用n1 / n2交叉验证来评估模型的准确性,然后使用神经计算系统进行建模。此外,开发了带有标定图的列线图,以预测显微解剖睾丸精子提取的精子回收率。我们将这些模型与逻辑回归进行了比较。结果:测试集中神经计算系统的ROC区域为0.641。神经网络正确地预测了256个测试集患者中的152个(59.4%)的结果。列线图AUC为0.59,并已充分校准。多变量logistic回归显示患者年龄,克氏综合征和隐睾症是精子取回的重要预测指标(p <0.05)。然而,通过内部验证,促卵泡激素和睾丸体积并不显着。结论:我们对术前良好的临床参数进行了组合建模,以使用神经计算系统和具有可接受的预测值的列线图预测精子的恢复。这些发现的普遍性需要外部验证。 ? 2013美国泌尿科协会教育与研究公司

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号