首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >Percutaneous Nephrostolithotomy-Is it Time to Abandon Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy?
【24h】

Percutaneous Nephrostolithotomy-Is it Time to Abandon Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy?

机译:经皮肾结石切开术-是时候放弃体外冲击波碎石术了吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This issue of The Journal features 2 reports on the current status of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy (PCNL). Bagrodia et al (page 149) demonstrated that simultaneous bilateral PCNL saves an average of Dollars 4,374 to Dollars 5,126 in direct hospital costs compared to staged bilateral PCNL with comparable complication rates. Unfortunately there are financial disincentives for urologists performing simultaneous bilateral PCNL in that they receive Dollars 275 to Dollars 1,069 less in reimbursement compared to staged PCNL. In this important article the authors argue that the urologist who performs simultaneous bilateral PCNL and, thereby, decreases costs to third party payers should appropriately and in turn receive increased reimbursement from said payers
机译:《期刊》的这一期刊载了2篇关于经皮肾结石切开术(PCNL)的现状的报道。 Bagrodia等人(第149页)证明,与分期进行的双侧PCNL相比,同时发生的双侧PCNL在并发症发生率上可平均节省4,374美元至5,126美元的直接住院费用。不幸的是,泌尿科医生对同时进行双侧双侧PCNL治疗有经济上的障碍,因为与分阶段PCNL相比,他们获得的报销少了275美元至1,069美元。在这篇重要文章中,作者认为,同时进行双侧PCNL并因此减少第三方付款人费用的泌尿科医师应适当地从转账人处获得更多的报销

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号