首页> 外文期刊>The journal of physical chemistry, B. Condensed matter, materials, surfaces, interfaces & biophysical >Optimizing Electrostatic Field Calculations with the Adaptive Poisson-Boltzmann Solver to Predict Electric Fields at Protein-Protein Interfaces II: Explicit Near-Probe and Hydrogen-Bonding Water Molecules
【24h】

Optimizing Electrostatic Field Calculations with the Adaptive Poisson-Boltzmann Solver to Predict Electric Fields at Protein-Protein Interfaces II: Explicit Near-Probe and Hydrogen-Bonding Water Molecules

机译:使用自适应Poisson-Boltzmann解算器优化静电场计算,以预测蛋白质-蛋白质界面处的电场II:显式近探针和氢键水分子

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We have examined the effects of including explicit, near-probe solvent molecules in a continuum electrostatics strategy using the linear Poisson-Boltzmann equation with the Adaptive Poisson-Boltzmann Solver (APBS) to calculate electric fields at the midpoint of a nitrile bond both at the surface of a monomeric protein and when docked at a protein—protein interface. Results were compared to experimental vibrational absorption energy measurements of the nitrile oscillator. We examined three methods for selecting explicit water molecules: (1) all water molecules within 5 A of the nitrile nitrogen; (2) the water molecule closest to the nitrile nitrogen; and (3) any single water molecule hydrogen-bonding to the nitrile. The correlation between absolute field strengths with experimental absorption energies were calculated and it was observed that method 1 was only an improvement for the monomer calculations, while methods 2 and 3 were not significantly different from the purely implicit solvent calculations for all protein systems examined. Upon taking the difference in calculated electrostatic fields and comparing to the difference in absorption frequencies, we typically observed an increase in experimental correlation for all methods, with method 1 showing the largest gain, likely due to the improved absolute monomer correlations using that method. These results suggest that, unlike with quantum mechanical methods, when calculating absolute fields using entirely classical models, implicit solvent is typically sufficient and additional work to identify hydrogen-bonding or nearest waters does not significantly impact the results. Although we observed that a sphere of solvent near the field of interest improved results for relative field calculations, it should not be consider a panacea for all situations.
机译:我们已经研究了使用线性Poisson-Boltzmann方程和自适应Poisson-Boltzmann求解器(APBS)来计算连续的静电学策略中包含明确的,接近探针的溶剂分子的作用,从而计算出了在腈键中点处的电场。单体蛋白质的表面,当停靠在蛋白质与蛋白质的界面时。将结果与丁腈振荡器的实验振动吸收能测量值进行比较。我们研究了三种选择显式水分子的方法:(1)在腈氮5 A以内的所有水分子; (2)最接近腈氮的水分子; (3)任何单个水分子氢键合到腈上。计算了绝对场强与实验吸收能之间的相关性,观察到方法1只是单体计算的一种改进,而方法2和3与所检查的所有蛋白质系统的纯隐含溶剂计算没有显着差异。考虑到计算得出的静电场差异并与吸收频率差异进行比较后,我们通常观察到所有方法的实验相关性都有所增加,方法1显示出最大的增益,这可能是由于使用该方法改善了绝对单体相关性所致。这些结果表明,与量子力学方法不同,当使用完全经典的模型计算绝对场时,隐含溶剂通常就足够了,识别氢键或最接近水域的额外工作不会显着影响结果。尽管我们观察到感兴趣的领域附近的溶剂球可以改善相对领域计算的结果,但不应将其视为所有情况下的灵丹妙药。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号