...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of physical chemistry, B. Condensed matter, materials, surfaces, interfaces & biophysical >Exploring the Role of Decoherence in Condensed-Phase Nonadiabatic Dynamics:A Comparison of Different Mixed Quantum/Classical Simulation Algorithms for the Excited Hydrated Electron
【24h】

Exploring the Role of Decoherence in Condensed-Phase Nonadiabatic Dynamics:A Comparison of Different Mixed Quantum/Classical Simulation Algorithms for the Excited Hydrated Electron

机译:探索退相干在凝聚相非绝热动力学中的作用:激发水合电子的不同混合量子/经典模拟算法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Mixed quantum/classical(MQC)molecular dynamics simulation has become the method of choice for simulating the dynamics of quantum mechanical objects that interact with condensed-phase systems.There are many MQC algorithms available,however,and in cases where nonadiabatic coupling is important,different algorithms may lead to different results.Thus,it has been difficult to reach definitive conclusions about relaxation dynamics using nonadiabatic MQC methods because one is never certain whether any given algorithm includes enough of the necessary physics.In this paper,we explore the physics underlying different nonadiabatic MQC algorithms by comparing and contrasting the excited-state relaxation dynamics of the prototypical condensed-phase MQC system,the hydrated electron,calculated using different algorithms,including:fewest-switches surface hopping,stationary-phase surface hopping,and mean-field dynamics with surface hopping.We also describe in detail how a new nonadiabatic algorithm,mean-field dynamics with stochastic decoherence(MF-SD),is to be implemented for condensed-phase problems,and we apply MF-SD to the excited-state relaxation of the hydrated electron.Our discussion emphasizes the different ways quantum decoherence is treated in each algorithm and the resulting implications for hydrated-electron relaxation dynamics.We find that for three MQC methods that use Tully's fewest-switches criterion to determine surface hopping probabilities,the excited-state lifetime of the electron is the same.Moreover,the nonequilibrium solvent response function of the excited hydrated electron is the same with all of the nonadiabatic MQC algorithms discussed here,so that all of the algorithms would produce similar agreement with experiment.Despite the identical solvent response predicted by each MQC algorithm,we find that MF-SD allows much more mixing of multiple basis states into the quantum wave function than do other methods.This leads to an excited-state lifetime that is longer with MF-SD than with any method that incorporates nonadiabatic effects with the fewest-switches surface hopping criterion.
机译:混合的量子/经典(MQC)分子动力学模拟已成为模拟与凝聚相系统相互作用的量子力学对象动力学的首选方法。但是,有许多MQC算法可用,并且在非绝热耦合很重要的情况下,不同的算法可能导致不同的结果。因此,使用非绝热MQC方法很难得出有关松弛动力学的明确结论,因为永远不能确定任何给定的算法是否包含足够的必要物理特性。通过比较和对比原型凝聚相MQC系统的水合电子的激发态弛豫动力学,使用不同的算法来计算不同的非绝热MQC算法,包括:最小开关表面跳变,静止相表面跳变和平均场跳动的动力学。我们还详细描述了一种新的非绝热算法将针对凝聚相问题实现具有随机退相干的场动力学(MF-SD),并将MF-SD应用于水合电子的激发态弛豫。我们的讨论着重讨论了量子退相干的不同处理方式我们发现,对于使用Tully最小开关准则来确定表面跳变概率的三种MQC方法,电子的激发态寿命是相同的。此外,非平衡激发的水合电子的溶剂响应函数与此处讨论的所有非绝热MQC算法都相同,因此所有算法都与实验产生相似的结果。尽管每种MQC算法预测的溶剂响应相同,但我们发现MF-与其他方法相比,SD允许将更多的基态混合到量子波函数中,从而导致激发态寿命为使用MF-SD的方法要比使用非绝热效应和最少的开关表面跳变准则的方法更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号