首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Chemical Physics >Ground-and excited-state diatomic bond lengths,vibrational levels,and potential-energy curves from conventional and localized Hartree-Fock-based density-functional theory
【24h】

Ground-and excited-state diatomic bond lengths,vibrational levels,and potential-energy curves from conventional and localized Hartree-Fock-based density-functional theory

机译:基于传统和局部基于Hartree-Fock的密度泛函理论的基态和激发态双原子键长,振动能级和势能曲线

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Ground-and excited-state diatomic bond lengths,vibrational levels,and potential-energy curves are determined using conventional and localized Hartree-Fock(LHF)-based density-functional theory.Exchange only and hybrid functionals(with various fractions of exchange)are considered,together with a standard generalized gradient approximation(GGA).Ground-state bond lengths and vibrational wave numbers are relatively insensitive to whether orbital exchange is treated using the conventional or LHF approach.Excited-state calculations are much more sensitive.For a standard fraction of orbital exchange,N_2 and CO vertical excitation energies at experimental bond lengths are accurately described by both conventional and LHF-based approaches,providing an asymptotic correction is present.Excited-state bond lengths and vibrational levels are more accurate with the conventional approach.The best quality,however,is obtained with an asymptotically corrected GGA functional.For the ground and lowest four singlet excited states,the GGA mean absolute errors in bond lengths are 0.006 A(0.5%)and 0.011 A(0.8%)for N_2 and CO,respectively.Mean absolute errors in fundamental vibrational wavenumbers are 49 cm~(-1)(2.7%)and 68 cm~(-1)(5.0%),respectively.The GGA potential-energy curves are compared with near-exact Rydberg-Klein-Rees curves.Agreement is very good for the ground and first excited state,but deteriorates for the higher states.
机译:基态和激发态双原子键长,振动能级和势能曲线是使用基于传统和局部基于Hartree-Fock(LHF)的密度泛函理论确定的。仅交换和混合泛函(具有不同交换分数)与标准的广义梯度近似(GGA)一起考虑。基态键长和振动波数对于使用传统方法还是LHF方法处理轨道交换相对不敏感。激发态计算要敏感得多。常规方法和基于LHF的方法都可以准确地描述实验键长处的轨道交换分数,N_2和CO垂直激发能,并提供渐近校正。使用常规方法,激发态键长和振动水平更加精确。但是,通过渐近校正的GGA功能可以获得最好的质量。对于地面和最低的四个单重激发态,N_2和CO的GGA平均键长绝对误差分别为0.006 A(0.5%)和0.011 A(0.8%)。基本振动波数的平均绝对误差为49 cm〜(-1)(2.7 %和68 cm〜(-1)(5.0%)分别比较GGA势能曲线和近乎精确的Rydberg-Klein-Rees曲线。基态和初激发态的一致性很好,但恶化了对于较高的州。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号