首页> 外文期刊>Crop Protection >Are extracts of neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss. (L.)) and Gliricidia sepium (Jacquin) an alternative to control pests on maize (Zea mays L.).
【24h】

Are extracts of neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss. (L.)) and Gliricidia sepium (Jacquin) an alternative to control pests on maize (Zea mays L.).

机译:是印em(Azadirachta indica A. Juss。(L.))和Gliricidia sepium(Jacquin)的提取物,是玉米(Zea mays L.)上害虫防治的替代品。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Extracts of plants have been used to control pests, but little information exists about how effective they are to limit crop damage, or how they affect plant growth, crop yield and insects. Extracts from Azadirachta indica A. Juss. (L.) leaves (NEEM treatment), a plant originating from India known for its bio-insecticide characteristics, and Gliricidia sepium (Jacquin kunth ex Walp.) (GLIRICIDIA treatment), a plant originating from Mexico and Central America known to repel insects, were compared to a standard insecticide, lambda-cyalothrin or KarateReg. (CHEMICAL treatment) for insect pest efficacy in cultivated maize in Chiapas, Mexico. Untreated maize plants served as control (CONTROL treatment). Plant damage, crop growth, yield and fauna were monitored during four growing seasons from 2003 to 2006. Mean maize yield was significantly higher in the NEEM and CHEMICAL treatments, i.e. 9784 and 9916 kg ha-1, respectively, compared to the CONTROL treatment (7206 kg ha-1). The GLIRICIDIA treatment yielded 8747 kg ha-1. Of the 26 insect species found during the growing season, only the number of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), Macrodactylus spp. (Coleoptera: Melolonthidae) and Frankliniella spp. (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) was significantly different between the treatments, with the lowest values found in the chemical treated plots. The amount of beneficial insects was not affected by treatment, while the amount of insects that cause damage was significantly lower (ca. 2-fold) in the CHEMICAL treatment than in the other treatments. Mean damage to the newly formed leaves was 18% in the NEEM treatment and 23% in the GLIRICIDIA treatment and significantly lower than that of the CONTROL treatment (37%), but significantly higher than that of the CHEMICAL treatment (11%). It was found that leaf extracts of G. sepium and A. indica reduced damage to the newly formed leaves and increased yields compared to untreated maize plants, with neem being more effective. However, neem was not as effective as chemical control with lambda-cyalothrin, for overall maize protection.
机译:植物提取物已被用于控制害虫,但是关于它们如何有效地限制作物危害,或它们如何影响植物生长,作物产量和昆虫的信息很少。 印za(Azadirachta indica) A. Juss。的提取物。 (L.)叶(NEEM处理),一种源自印度的生物杀虫剂特性,以及 Gliricidia sepium (Jacquin kunth ex Walp。)(GLIRICIDIA处理),一种源自墨西哥的植物在美国和已知能驱除昆虫的中美洲地区,将其与标准杀虫剂lambda-cyalothrin或KarateReg进行了比较。 (化学处理)墨西哥恰帕斯州栽培玉米的害虫功效。未经处理的玉米植物作为对照(对照处理)。在2003年至2006年的四个生长季节中监测了植物的损害,作物的生长,单产和动物区系。NEEM和化学处理的玉米平均单产显着更高,分别为9784和9916 kg ha -1 ,相比于对照(7206 kg ha -1 )。 GLIRICIDIA处理的产量为8747 kg ha -1 。在生长期中发现的26种昆虫中,只有鳞翅目(Spodoptera frugiperda)(鳞翅目:夜蛾科), Macrodactylus spp数量。 (鞘翅目:Melononthidae)和 Frankliniella spp。 (Th翅目:蓟马)之间的处理之间有显着差异,在化学处理的地块中最低。有益昆虫的数量不受治疗的影响,而引起化学破坏的昆虫的数量在化学治疗中明显低于其他治疗(约2倍)。在NEEM处理中,新形成的叶片的平均损害为18%,在GLIRICIDIA处理中为23%,显着低于对照处理(37%),但显着高于化学处理(11%)。已发现 G的叶提取物。隔和 A。与未经处理的玉米植物相比,印度d减少了对新形成的叶片的伤害并提高了产量,印ne更为有效。然而,印em在总体上保护玉米方面不如用lambda-cyalothrin进行化学防治有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号