...
首页> 外文期刊>Crop Protection >Can grain growers and agronomists identify common leaf diseases and biosecurity threats in grain crops? An Australian example
【24h】

Can grain growers and agronomists identify common leaf diseases and biosecurity threats in grain crops? An Australian example

机译:谷物种植者和农艺师能否确定谷物作物中常见的叶病和生物安全威胁?澳大利亚的例子

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Australian grains industry relies upon growers and agronomists to be aware of pests and diseases in their crops and to notify their local State Department of Agriculture when they suspect an incursion of a high priority pest (HPP). This raises the question "Are growers and agronomists, within the Australian grains industry, able to meet this expectation?" A training needs analysis was undertaken to determine the capacity of growers and agronomists to identify three endemic diseases (powdery mildew in barley, stripe rust in wheat and blackleg in canola) in their crops. Their knowledge of the top four-biosecurity threats to the Australian grains industry (Karnal bunt, Khapra beetle, barley stripe rust and Russian wheat aphid) was also determined. Benchmarks for successfully identifying these diseases were set beforehand at 70% of growers and 80% of agronomists; participants' ability to identify these endemic diseases in crops met these benchmarks. However, their ability to recognise blackleg in canola was significantly lower than for the two cereal foliar diseases. There was a significant correlation of region with these capabilities, with a greater proportion of participants in Western Australia (WA) recognising powdery mildew in barley than in Eastern Australia (EA). In contrast, a greater proportion of participants in EA were able to identify stripe rust of wheat than in WA. The education levels of participants corresponded with their ability to identify blackleg in canola. Participants' knowledge and awareness of symptoms and signs associated with the top four biosecurity threats were well below expectations; fewer than half of the participants answered questions on these four HPPs. Gender, age and educational level did not correlate with the participants' knowledge and awareness of the four HPPs with the exception of Karnal bunt. Participants with a higher level of education had significantly more knowledge of symptoms associated with Karnal bunt than did participants with lower levels of education. The use of diagnostic services by the grains industry participants is a vital component of general surveillance. This survey showed that use of these services by growers was significantly lower than by agronomists. Awareness of the National Exotic Plant Pest Hotline and GrainGuard was significantly lower than other diagnostic services for both growers and agronomists. Diagnostic services need to be promoted further to increase awareness and use by growers and agronomists. Correct diagnosis of disease and pest symptoms is vital for the biosecurity of the grains industry. Crown Copyright (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:澳大利亚谷物工业依靠种植者和农艺师了解作物中的病虫害,并在怀疑有高优先级虫害(HPP)入侵时通知当地的农业部。这就提出了一个问题:“澳大利亚谷物工业中的种植者和农艺师是否能够满足这一期望?”进行了培训需求分析,以确定种植者和农艺师确定其作物中的三种地方病(大麦粉尘,小麦条锈病和双低油菜籽黑粉病)的能力。还确定了他们对澳大利亚谷物业面临的四大生物安全威胁的了解(Karnal bunt,Khapra甲虫,大麦条纹锈病和俄罗斯小麦蚜虫)。预先为70%的种植者和80%的农学家设定了成功识别这些疾病的基准;参与者识别农作物中这些地方病的能力达到了这些基准。但是,他们识别双低油菜籽中黑腿病的能力明显低于两种谷物叶面疾病。区域与这些功能之间存在显着的相关性,西澳大利亚州(WA)识别大麦白粉病的参与者要多于东澳大利亚州(EA)。相比之下,与西澳大利亚州相比,与西澳大利亚州相比,参与EA的参与者能够识别出小麦条锈病的比例更高。参与者的教育水平与其在双低油菜籽中发现黑腿病的能力相对应。与会者对与四大生物安全威胁有关的症状和体征的了解和认识远低于预期;不到一半的参与者回答了关于这四个HPP的问题。性别,年龄和受教育程度与参与者对四种HPP的知识和意识没有关联,但Karnal bunt除外。受教育程度较高的参与者比受教育程度较低的参与者对与Karnal bunt相关的症状的了解要多得多。谷物行业参与者使用诊断服务是常规监视的重要组成部分。这项调查显示,种植者对这些服务的使用明显低于农学家。对种植者和农学家而言,国家外来植物病虫害热线和GrainGuard的意识明显低于其他诊断服务。需要进一步促进诊断服务,以提高种植者和农艺师的认识和使用。正确诊断病虫害症状对于谷物工业的生物安全至关重要。 Crown版权所有(C)2016,由Elsevier Ltd.发行。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号