...
首页> 外文期刊>Cornea >Comparison of confocal biomicroscopy and noncontact specular microscopy for evaluation of the corneal endothelium.
【24h】

Comparison of confocal biomicroscopy and noncontact specular microscopy for evaluation of the corneal endothelium.

机译:共焦生物显微镜和非接触式镜面显微镜用于评估角膜内皮的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical efficacy of confocal biomicroscopy with that of noncontact specular microscopy for the evaluation of the corneal endothelium. METHODS: The corneal endothelium was examined in 14 normal subjects (28 eyes) and in 6 patients (11 eyes) with Fuchs corneal endothelial dystrophy using a noncontact specular microscope (SP-2000P, Topcon, Japan) and a confocal biomicroscope (ConfoScan, Tomey, Japan). The images and the calculated densities of corneal endothelial cells obtained by the 2 techniques were compared. RESULTS: For normal subjects, the images of corneal endothelial cells obtained by the 2 techniques were almost identical, although the density of these cells determined by confocal biomicroscopy (2916 +/- 334 cells/mm2) was slightly higher than that determined by noncontact specular microscopy (2765 +/- 323 cells/mm2). In contrast, whereas clear images of corneal endothelial cells, allowing the determination of cell density, were obtained for all 11 eyes of the patient group by confocal biomicroscopy, clear images were obtained for only 4 of these 11 eyes (36.4%) by noncontact specular microscopy. CONCLUSION: Both noncontact specular microscopy and confocal biomicroscopy revealed the shapes and number of endothelial cells in the normal cornea. However, for corneas with Fuchs dystrophy, clear images were obtained only by confocal biomicroscopy. Confocal biomicroscopy is thus an effective tool for evaluation of the diseased corneal endothelium.
机译:目的:比较共聚焦生物显微镜和非接触式镜面显微镜对角膜内皮的临床疗效。方法:使用非接触式镜面显微镜(SP-2000P,日本Topcon,日本)和共聚焦生物显微镜(ConfoScan,Tomey)对14例正常受试者(28眼)和6例患者(11眼)的Fuchs角膜内皮营养不良进行了角膜内皮检查。 , 日本)。比较了通过两种技术获得的图像和计算的角膜内皮细胞的密度。结果:对于正常受试者,通过两种技术获得的角膜内皮细胞图像几乎相同,尽管通过共聚焦生物显微镜确定的这些细胞的密度(2916 +/- 334细胞/ mm2)略高于通过非接触镜检确定的密度。显微镜(2765 +/- 323细胞/ mm2)。相比之下,虽然通过共聚焦生物显微镜对患者组的所有11眼获得了可确定细胞密度的角膜内皮细胞的清晰图​​像,但通过非接触式镜面反射仅获得了这11眼中的4眼(36.4%)的清晰图像显微镜检查。结论:非接触式镜检显微镜和共聚焦生物显微镜检查均显示正常角膜中内皮细胞的形状和数量。然而,对于具有Fuchs营养不良的角膜,仅通过共聚焦生物显微镜才能获得清晰的图像。因此,共聚焦生物显微镜检查是评估患病角膜内皮的有效工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号