...
首页> 外文期刊>Croatian medical journal >Awareness and use of evidence-based medicine databases and Cochrane Library among physicians in Croatia.
【24h】

Awareness and use of evidence-based medicine databases and Cochrane Library among physicians in Croatia.

机译:克罗地亚医师对循证医学数据库和Cochrane图书馆的了解和使用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AIM: To assess awareness and use of evidence-based medicine (EBM) databases and The Cochrane Library among physicians in Croatia. METHODS: A cross-sectional study with a telephone survey was performed among 573 physicians (88.6% response rate from 647 contacted physicians) from family practice and 4 major university hospital centers in Croatia. The main outcome measures were physicians' awareness of The Cochrane Collaboration, awareness and use of The Cochrane Library, access to EBM databases, and access to internet at work. RESULTS: Overall, 54% of respondents said they had access to EBM databases, but when asked which databases they used, they named mostly non-EBM databases. The question on the highest level of evidence in EBM was correctly answered by 53% respondents, 30% heard of The Cochrane Collaboration, and 34% heard about The Cochrane Library. They obtained information about The Cochrane Library mostly from colleagues and research articles, whereas the information about EBM was gained mainly during continuous medical education. There were more respondents who thought The Cochrane Library could help them in practice (58%) than those who heard about The Cochrane Library (30%). Only 20% of the respondents heard about the initiative for the establishment of the Croatian branch of The Cochrane Collaboration. Family physicians had significantly lower level of awareness, knowledge, and use of EBM and The Cochrane Library than physicians from university hospitals. CONCLUSION: There is low awareness about EBM and The Cochrane Library among physicians in Croatia, which creates a need for educational interventions about EBM for the benefit of health care in Croatia.
机译:目的:评估克罗地亚医师对循证医学(EBM)数据库和Cochrane图书馆的认识和使用。方法:对来自家庭实践和克罗地亚4个主要大学医院中心的573名医生进行了横断面研究,并进行了电话调查(647位联系医生的回复率为88.6%)。主要结果指标包括医师对Cochrane合作的认识,对Cochrane图书馆的认识和使用,对EBM数据库的访问以及对工作中互联网的访问。结果:总体上,有54%的受访者表示他们可以访问EBM数据库,但是当被问到使用了哪些数据库时,他们大多使用了非EBM数据库。 53%的回答者,30%的听说过Cochrane协作以及34%的听说过Cochrane图书馆正确回答了有关EBM最高证据水平的问题。他们主要从同事和研究文章中获得有关Cochrane图书馆的信息,而有关EBM的信息主要来自持续医学教育。有更多的受访者认为Cochrane图书馆可以在实践中为他们提供帮助(58%),而不是那些听说过Cochrane图书馆的人(占30%)。只有20%的受访者听说过建立Cochrane合作组织克罗地亚分支机构的倡议。与大学医院的医生相比,家庭医生对EBM和The Cochrane图书馆的了解,知识和使用水平明显较低。结论:克罗地亚医生对EBM和Cochrane图书馆的了解不高,这需要对EBM进行教育干预以造福克罗地亚的医疗保健。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号