...
首页> 外文期刊>Coronary artery disease >Delayed versus immediate stenting for the treatment of ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction with a high thrombus burden
【24h】

Delayed versus immediate stenting for the treatment of ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction with a high thrombus burden

机译:延迟与立即置入支架治疗高血栓负担的ST段抬高急性心肌梗死

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: High thrombus burden (HTB) is an independent predictor of no flow or low reflow during a primary percutaneous coronary intervention. This study aimed to compare immediate versus delayed stenting in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with HTB. METHODS: In this retrospective, nonrandomized study, a total of 103 consecutive STEMI patients with HTB (thrombus burden score, TBS≥3) were assigned to immediate stenting (IS group, n=50) or delayed stenting (DS group, n=53), a decision that was made at the discretion of the operators. The IS group received stent placement immediately, whereas the DS group was given enhanced antithrombotic therapies and deferred for stenting at least 7 days later. Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow score (TIMIs) and myocardial blush grade (MBG) were assessed angiographically and the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was measured echocardiographically. The major adverse cardiac event (MACE) was the composite of cardiac death, reinfarction, target vessel revascularization, heart failure, and major bleeding. RESULTS: The DS group had better immediate MBG (P<0.001), higher LVEF at 6 months (P=0.044), and lower MACE rate at 1 year (log-rank P=0.008). Multiple logistic regression identified immediate stenting (odds ratio 7.4, 95% confidence interval 2.1-26.6; P=0.002) and high TBS (odds ratio 2.6, 95% confidence interval 1.1-6.5, P=0.034) as the independent predictors of poor myocardial perfusion. Delayed stenting benefited the male patients, those who were of a younger age, and those who had a larger infarction-related artery, higher TBS, or lower TIMIs in terms of MBG or MACE. Delayed stenting avoided stent implantation of the infarct-related artery in 12/53 (22.6%) patients particularly in the younger patients. CONCLUSION: For STEMI patients with HTB who have undergone initial thrombectomy, delayed stenting is safe and feasible, and may be associated with better immediate myocardial perfusion, more LV function recovery, and less occurrence of MACE at the 1-year follow-up.
机译:目的:高血栓负荷(HTB)是初次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间无血流或低血流的独立预测因子。这项研究的目的是比较STB抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)HTB患者的立即支架置入和延迟支架置入。方法:在这项回顾性非随机性研究中,将103例连续的STEMI HTB患者(血栓负荷评分,TBS≥3)分配为立即置入支架(IS组,n = 50)或延迟置入支架(DS组,n = 53)。 ),由运营商自行决定。 IS组立即接受支架置入,而DS组接受增强的抗血栓治疗,并推迟至少7天进行支架置入。通过血管造影评估心肌梗死的溶栓(TIMI)流量评分(TIMIs)和心肌腮红等级(MBG),并通过超声心动图测量左心室射血分数(LVEF)。主要的不良心脏事件(MACE)是心脏死亡,再梗塞,靶血管血运重建,心力衰竭和大出血的综合表现。结果:DS组立即MBG(P <0.001),6个月LVEF较高(P = 0.044),1年MACE发生率较低(log-rank P = 0.008)。多元logistic回归确定立即置入支架(几率7.4,95%置信区间2.1-2.6; P = 0.002)和高TBS(几率2.6,95%置信区间1.1-6.5,P = 0.034)是不良心肌的独立预测因子灌注。延迟支架置入术有益于男性患者,年龄较小的患者以及梗塞相关动脉较大,TBS较高或TIMIs较低的MBG或MACE。延迟支架置入可避免12/53(22.6%)患者尤其是年轻患者的支架植入。结论:对于初次行血栓切除术的STEMI HTB患者,支架置入延迟是安全可行的,并且可能与更好的立即心肌灌注,左室功能恢复更多和在1年随访中发生MACE较少有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号